S. Oskam

422 total citations
13 papers, 298 citations indexed

About

S. Oskam is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, S. Oskam has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 298 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in S. Oskam's work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers). S. Oskam is often cited by papers focused on Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers) and Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (4 papers). S. Oskam collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Australia. S. Oskam's co-authors include Inge Okkes, H Lamberts, Kees van Boven, Jean Karl Soler, Frank Dobbs, G E Fryer, M Jevtić, Henk Schers, Arend J. Groen and Aline Ramond‐Roquin and has published in prestigious journals such as Family Practice, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine and Methods of Information in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

S. Oskam

13 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S. Oskam Netherlands 9 130 92 55 54 45 13 298
Sarah O’Brien United Kingdom 11 97 0.7× 59 0.6× 15 0.3× 77 1.4× 43 1.0× 23 365
Glen R. Couchman United States 10 180 1.4× 47 0.5× 29 0.5× 54 1.0× 44 1.0× 15 335
Laurence H. Baker United States 8 222 1.7× 66 0.7× 43 0.8× 89 1.6× 56 1.2× 10 422
Daniel Dicker United States 5 85 0.7× 64 0.7× 19 0.3× 64 1.2× 30 0.7× 6 329
Joshua W. Devine United States 8 38 0.3× 57 0.6× 33 0.6× 40 0.7× 89 2.0× 23 302
Tristan Watson Canada 11 78 0.6× 31 0.3× 15 0.3× 38 0.7× 33 0.7× 28 327
J. L. Ellis United States 4 202 1.6× 200 2.2× 21 0.4× 28 0.5× 124 2.8× 6 409
Tora Grauers Willadsen Denmark 9 154 1.2× 308 3.3× 26 0.5× 29 0.5× 151 3.4× 19 416
Alexis Skoufalos United States 9 117 0.9× 67 0.7× 9 0.2× 73 1.4× 54 1.2× 22 319
Sayuri Shimizu Japan 10 58 0.4× 66 0.7× 24 0.4× 38 0.7× 45 1.0× 44 363

Countries citing papers authored by S. Oskam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Oskam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Oskam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Oskam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Oskam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Oskam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Oskam. The network helps show where S. Oskam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S. Oskam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S. Oskam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S. Oskam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S. Oskam. S. Oskam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Boven, Kees van, et al.. (2017). The Diagnostic Value of the Patient’s Reason for Encounter for Diagnosing Cancer in Primary Care. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 30(6). 806–812. 13 indexed citations
2.
Boven, Kees van, et al.. (2016). The value of reasons for encounter in early detection of colorectal cancer. European Journal of General Practice. 22(2). 91–95. 4 indexed citations
3.
Ramond‐Roquin, Aline, et al.. (2015). Psychosocial, musculoskeletal and somatoform comorbidity in patients with chronic low back pain: original results from the Dutch Transition Project. Family Practice. 32(3). 297–304. 16 indexed citations
4.
5.
Soler, Jean Karl, et al.. (2013). The interpretation of the reasons for encounter 'cough' and'sadness' in four international family medicine populations. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics. 20(1). 25–39. 6 indexed citations
6.
7.
8.
9.
Okkes, Inge, et al.. (2007). Once tired, always tired? Limitations in function over time of tired patients in Dutch general practice. European Journal of General Practice. 13(2). 67–74. 5 indexed citations
10.
Lamberts, H, S. Oskam, & Inge Okkes. (2005). [The clinical relationship between symptoms and the final diagnosis in general practice, determined by means of posterior probabilities calculated on the basis of the Transition Project].. PubMed. 149(46). 2566–72. 12 indexed citations
11.
Okkes, Inge, et al.. (2002). The role of family practice in different health care systems: a comparison of reasons for encounter, diagnoses, and interventions in primary care populations in the Netherlands, Japan, Poland, and the United States.. PubMed. 51(1). 72–3. 65 indexed citations
12.
Okkes, Inge, S. Oskam, & H Lamberts. (2002). The probability of specific diagnoses for patients presenting with common symptoms to Dutch family physicians.. PubMed. 51(1). 31–6. 94 indexed citations
13.
Groen, Arend J., et al.. (2001). Advantages of Long Observation in Episode-oriented Electronic Patient Records in Family Practice. Methods of Information in Medicine. 40(3). 229–235. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah O’Brien Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Glen R. Couchman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laurence H. Baker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Dicker Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joshua W. Devine Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tristan Watson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. L. Ellis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tora Grauers Willadsen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexis Skoufalos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sayuri Shimizu
Rankless by CCL
2026