Katja Scholz

607 citations
11 papers · 453 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 2
    • Congenital heart defects research 2
    • S100 Proteins and Annexins 1
    • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications 3

Katja Scholz

10 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Katja Scholz
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ophthalmology 79
  • Epidemiology 146
  • Cell Biology 64
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 71
  • Clinical Psychology 65
Replace Denize Atan with:
Denize Atan United Kingdom
Amy Turriff United States
T Flage Norway
Chhitij Srivastava India
Ayala Aviram‐Goldring Israel
Carmen Ramos Spain
Brian Sullivan United States
Olivier Roche France
Paula Moore United States
Carolin Otto Germany
Katja Scholz relative to Denize Atan United Kingdom Denize Atan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Denize Atan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Katja Scholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katja Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katja Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katja Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katja Scholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katja Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katja Scholz. The network helps show where Katja Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Katja Scholz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Katja Scholz Line = papers co-authored together Katja Scholz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2009138
2 2011133
3 200569
4 200930
5 202229
6 201123
7 200822
8 20074
9 20072
10 20112
11 19811

About Katja Scholz

Katja Scholz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Epidemiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (2 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), S100 Proteins and Annexins (1 paper), Moyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment (1 paper) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (79 citations), Epidemiology (146 citations), Cell Biology (64 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (71 citations) and Clinical Psychology (65 citations). Katja Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Cyprus and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Achim Langenbucher, Timo Eppig, Ferdinand le Noble, Janna Krueger, Dong Liu, Christian Klein, Michael Scholz, Yu Shi, Stefan Schulte‐Merker and Melissa Cudmore. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Radiology, Advanced Science and Journal of Cell Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact