Kathryn M. King

948 total citations
26 papers, 655 citations indexed

About

Kathryn M. King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathryn M. King has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 655 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Kathryn M. King's work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers). Kathryn M. King is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Health and Mental Health (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers). Kathryn M. King collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Iran and United Kingdom. Kathryn M. King's co-authors include Theresa Green, Lisa M. McGregor, Tracey J. F. Colella, Pamela LeBlanc, Nadia Khan, Hude Quan, Heather M. Arthur, Pauline Paul, Charlotte Jones and Sailesh Mohan and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, The American Journal of Cardiology and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Kathryn M. King

25 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathryn M. King Canada 14 229 128 109 108 99 26 655
Kate Hill United Kingdom 16 257 1.1× 266 2.1× 99 0.9× 86 0.8× 69 0.7× 43 890
Iris F. Groeneveld Netherlands 17 389 1.7× 271 2.1× 120 1.1× 67 0.6× 109 1.1× 31 1.1k
Mette Grønkjær Denmark 16 364 1.6× 147 1.1× 40 0.4× 90 0.8× 68 0.7× 79 892
Sue Randall Australia 17 264 1.2× 164 1.3× 48 0.4× 136 1.3× 34 0.3× 69 882
Susan Law Canada 14 219 1.0× 121 0.9× 177 1.6× 31 0.3× 73 0.7× 56 901
Sueli Marques Brazil 20 421 1.8× 146 1.1× 66 0.6× 39 0.4× 103 1.0× 56 877
Robyn Smith Australia 15 400 1.7× 127 1.0× 40 0.4× 31 0.3× 79 0.8× 31 688
Vida Shafipour Iran 13 214 0.9× 134 1.0× 34 0.3× 62 0.6× 44 0.4× 60 597
Karin Biering Denmark 19 336 1.5× 128 1.0× 37 0.3× 65 0.6× 84 0.8× 60 954
James C. Romeis United States 19 310 1.4× 140 1.1× 32 0.3× 55 0.5× 156 1.6× 51 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn M. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn M. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn M. King. The network helps show where Kathryn M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn M. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn M. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn M. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn M. King. Kathryn M. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Charlotte, et al.. (2011). Tackling health literacy: adaptation of public hypertension educational materials for an Indo-Asian population in Canada. BMC Public Health. 11(1). 24–24. 44 indexed citations
2.
King, Kathryn M., Nadia Khan, Pamela LeBlanc, & Hude Quan. (2011). Examining and establishing translational and conceptual equivalence of survey questionnaires for a multi-ethnic, multi-language study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 67(10). 2267–2274. 17 indexed citations
3.
Chen, Guanmin, Nadia Khan, Kathryn M. King, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, & Hude Quan. (2010). Home care utilization and outcomes among Asian and other Canadian patients with heart failure. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 10(1). 12–12. 4 indexed citations
4.
Parker, Karen F., et al.. (2010). Using social exchange theory to guide successful study recruitment and retention. Nurse Researcher. 17(2). 74–82. 7 indexed citations
5.
King, Kathryn M., Nadia Khan, & Hude Quan. (2009). Ethnic Variation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Presentation and Access to Care. The American Journal of Cardiology. 103(10). 1368–1373. 41 indexed citations
6.
Stone, James A., et al.. (2009). Achieving Interprofessional Practice in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention. 29(6). 380–384. 4 indexed citations
7.
Green, Theresa, et al.. (2008). Smell and taste dysfunction following minor stroke: a case report.. PubMed. 30(2). 10–3. 17 indexed citations
8.
LeBlanc, Pamela, et al.. (2008). Older immigrant Sikh men's perspective of the challenges of managing coronary heart disease risk. Journal of Men s Health. 5(3). 218–226. 13 indexed citations
9.
King, Kathryn M., et al.. (2007). First Nations People's Challenge in Managing Coronary Artery Disease Risk. Qualitative Health Research. 17(8). 1074–1087. 19 indexed citations
10.
Green, Theresa & Kathryn M. King. (2007). The trajectory of minor stroke recovery for men and their female spousal caregivers: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 58(6). 517–531. 45 indexed citations
11.
McGregor, Lisa M., et al.. (2006). The telephone interview is an effective method of data collection in clinical nursing research: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 44(6). 1064–1070. 166 indexed citations
12.
King, Kathryn M., et al.. (2006). Gender-based challenges faced by older Sikh women as immigrants: recognizing and acting on the risk of coronary artery disease.. PubMed. 38(1). 16–40. 23 indexed citations
13.
King, Kathryn M., et al.. (2005). Men and women managing coronary artery disease risk: Urban–rural contrasts. Social Science & Medicine. 62(5). 1091–1102. 33 indexed citations
14.
Thurston, Norma E. & Kathryn M. King. (2005). Implementing evidence-based practice: walking the talk. Journal of Vascular Nursing. 23(2). 54–60. 1 indexed citations
15.
Thurston, Norma E. & Kathryn M. King. (2004). Implementing evidence-based practice: Walking the talk. Applied Nursing Research. 17(4). 239–247. 10 indexed citations
16.
King, Kathryn M. & Heather M. Arthur. (2003). Coronary Heart Disease Prevention. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 18(4). 274–281. 14 indexed citations
17.
King, Kathryn M.. (2001). Book Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 23(1). 105–106.
18.
Forbes, Dorothy, et al.. (1999). Warrantable evidence in nursing science. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 29(2). 373–379. 28 indexed citations
19.
King, Kathryn M. & Pauline Paul. (1996). A Historical Review of the Depiction of Women in Cardiovascular Literature. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 18(1). 89–101. 13 indexed citations
20.
King, Kathryn M., et al.. (1996). The women's health agenda: evolution of hormone replacement therapy as treatment and prophylaxis for coronary artery disease. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 23(5). 984–991. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026