Kate Hill

1.3k total citations
43 papers, 890 citations indexed

About

Kate Hill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Hill has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 890 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 8 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Kate Hill's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (7 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). Kate Hill is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (8 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (7 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers). Kate Hill collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Kate Hill's co-authors include Allan House, M F Muers, Stephanie Honey, Jenni Murray, Cheryl Craigs, Jenny Hewison, C. Round, C.K. Connolly, Peter Knapp and Robert West and has published in prestigious journals such as Stroke, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health and Quality of Life Research.

In The Last Decade

Kate Hill

43 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Hill United Kingdom 16 266 257 191 141 112 43 890
Laura Deckx Australia 17 221 0.8× 205 0.8× 243 1.3× 113 0.8× 122 1.1× 40 1.2k
Yvonne Leung Canada 18 162 0.6× 209 0.8× 196 1.0× 72 0.5× 152 1.4× 53 1.1k
Karen la Cour Denmark 16 290 1.1× 164 0.6× 224 1.2× 206 1.5× 99 0.9× 74 755
Cheryl L. Shigaki United States 17 133 0.5× 207 0.8× 157 0.8× 75 0.5× 138 1.2× 31 857
Dorothy Brockopp United States 20 258 1.0× 196 0.8× 199 1.0× 321 2.3× 170 1.5× 69 1.2k
Anne Marie Lunde Husebø Norway 16 107 0.4× 231 0.9× 297 1.6× 139 1.0× 68 0.6× 36 777
Brenda Grabsch Australia 16 278 1.0× 221 0.9× 621 3.3× 302 2.1× 135 1.2× 29 1.2k
Gayenell Magwood United States 21 307 1.2× 523 2.0× 51 0.3× 68 0.5× 107 1.0× 78 1.3k
G A van den Bos Netherlands 13 236 0.9× 260 1.0× 75 0.4× 103 0.7× 77 0.7× 15 901
Salene M. W. Jones United States 18 175 0.7× 505 2.0× 185 1.0× 118 0.8× 133 1.2× 75 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Hill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Hill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Hill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Hill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Hill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Hill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Hill. The network helps show where Kate Hill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Hill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Hill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Hill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Hill. Kate Hill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Powell, Pippa, et al.. (2018). What do patients know? Education from the European Lung Foundation perspective. Breathe. 14(1). 30–35. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hill, Kate, et al.. (2018). Meet the researchers: an alternative method of engaging patients with research in mesothelioma. Research Involvement and Engagement. 4(1). 33–33. 5 indexed citations
4.
Murphy, Dominic, et al.. (2016). Long-term responses to treatment in UK veterans with military-related PTSD: an observational study. BMJ Open. 6(9). e011667–e011667. 28 indexed citations
5.
Hill, Kate, Rebecca Walwyn, Jenni Murray, et al.. (2015). A Randomized Feasibility Trial of a New Lifestyle Referral Assessment Versus Usual Assessment in an Acute Cardiology Setting. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 31(6). 507–516. 1 indexed citations
6.
Munyombwe, Theresa, Kate Hill, Peter Knapp, & Robert West. (2014). Mixture modelling analysis of one-month disability after stroke: stroke outcomes study (SOS1). Quality of Life Research. 23(8). 2267–2275. 2 indexed citations
7.
Honey, Stephanie, Kate Hill, Jenni Murray, Cheryl Craigs, & Allan House. (2014). Patients’ responses to the communication of vascular risk in primary care: a qualitative study. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 16(1). 61–70. 11 indexed citations
8.
Honey, Stephanie, et al.. (2013). Differences in the perceived role of the healthcare provider in delivering vascular health checks: a Q methodology study. BMC Family Practice. 14(1). 172–172. 16 indexed citations
9.
Brock, Kim, et al.. (2013). Does a focus on participation and personal goal achievement have an impact on depression in the first year after stroke. International Journal of Stroke. 8. 2 indexed citations
10.
McCabe, Carla, et al.. (2013). A Contingent Valuation Survey Of User Financial Incentives For Health Behaviour Change. Value in Health. 16(3). A11–A11. 2 indexed citations
11.
Murray, Jenni, Stephanie Honey, Kate Hill, Cheryl Craigs, & Allan House. (2012). Individual influences on lifestyle change to reduce vascular risk: a qualitative literature review. British Journal of General Practice. 62(599). e403–e410. 28 indexed citations
12.
Ziegler, Lucy, Kate Hill, Mike Bennett, et al.. (2011). Identifying Psychological Distress at Key Stages of the Cancer Illness Trajectory: A Systematic Review of Validated Self-Report Measures. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 41(3). 619–636. 69 indexed citations
13.
Johnston, A. E., Roland Asmar, Björn Dahlöf, et al.. (2011). Generic and therapeutic substitution: a viewpoint on achieving best practice in Europe. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 72(5). 727–730. 38 indexed citations
14.
Holch, Patricia, Kate Absolom, Simon Pini, et al.. (2011). Oncology professionals' views on the use of antidepressants in cancer patients: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 1(3). 301–305. 9 indexed citations
15.
West, Robert, Kate Hill, Jenny Hewison, Peter Knapp, & Allan House. (2010). Psychological Disorders After Stroke Are an Important Influence on Functional Outcomes. Stroke. 41(8). 1723–1727. 54 indexed citations
16.
Hill, Kate, et al.. (2007). Fluoxetine vs placebo for depressive symptoms after stroke: failed randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 22(10). 963–965. 12 indexed citations
17.
Hill, Kate, et al.. (2003). Do newly diagnosed lung cancer patients feel their concerns are being met?. European Journal of Cancer Care. 12(1). 35–45. 89 indexed citations
18.
Hill, Kate, et al.. (2001). Living with severe COPD. A qualitative exploration of the experience of patients in Leeds. Respiratory Medicine. 95(3). 196–204. 81 indexed citations
19.
McCarroll, James E., et al.. (1995). Working with traumatic material: Effects on Holocaust Memorial Museum staff.. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 65(1). 66–75. 14 indexed citations
20.
Märk, Robert, A. Ş. Çakmak, Kate Hill, & Robyn Davidson. (1970). Structural analysis of Hagia Sophia: a historical perspective. WIT transactions on the built environment. 3. 33–46. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026