James C. Romeis
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Elena M. AndresenC BrownsonRodney M. CoeSeth A. EisenKathleen N. GillespieFredric D. WolinskyMichael J. LyonsDouglas K. Miller
- Topics
- Healthcare Policy and Management (14 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwanBelgium
In The Last Decade
James C. Romeis
51 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- General Health Professions 310
- Economics and Econometrics 270
- Psychiatry and Mental health 156
- Epidemiology 140
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 140
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Romeis
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Romeis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Romeis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Romeis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Romeis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Romeis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Romeis. The network helps show where James C. Romeis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Romeis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Romeis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Romeis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Romeis. James C. Romeis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | Heritability of self-reported health. | 47 |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 213 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About James C. Romeis
James C. Romeis is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Health, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (61 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (82 citations) and Health (138 citations). James C. Romeis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Elena M. Andresen, C Brownson, Rodney M. Coe, Seth A. Eisen, Kathleen N. Gillespie, Fredric D. Wolinsky, Michael J. Lyons, Douglas K. Miller, William R. True and Kathleen K. Bucholz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Medical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.