Kathleen Custers

20 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Kathleen Custers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Clinical Psychology 149
  • Communication 44
  • Sociology and Political Science 236
  • Gender Studies 49
  • Applied Psychology 23
Replace Moshe Israelashvili with:
Moshe Israelashvili Israel
Shu‐Sha Angie Guan United States
Melek Kalkan Türkiye
Aimee E. Miller‐Ott United States
Eunha Kim South Korea
Lauren A. Spies Shapiro United States
Uğur Doğan Türkiye
Vanessa M. Buote Canada
Troy E. Beckert United States
Jessica A. Latack United States
Kathleen Custers relative to Moshe Israelashvili Israel Moshe Israelashvili's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Moshe Israelashvili · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Custers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Custers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Custers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Custers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Custers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Custers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Custers. The network helps show where Kathleen Custers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Kathleen Custers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kathleen Custers Line = papers co-authored together Kathleen Custers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200976
2 200964
3 201250
4 201238
5 201638
6 201536
7 201635
8 200935
9 201531
10 202116
11 201116
12 201515
13 201114
14 201614
15 201712
16 200911
17 201610
18 20156
19 20116
20
The portrayal of health problems in entertainment television: implications for risk perception and health promotion
20133

About Kathleen Custers

Kathleen Custers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Communication, having authored 20 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (149 citations), Communication (44 citations), Sociology and Political Science (236 citations), Gender Studies (49 citations) and Applied Psychology (23 citations). Kathleen Custers has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Van den Bulck, Liese Exelmans, Elizabeth Dorrance Hall, Elisabeth Timmermans, Steven R. Wilson, Lik H. Wee, Maria Meledina, Stuart Turner, Johan A. Martens and Bert Oben. Their work appears in journals such as Communication Research, European Journal of Pediatrics, Mass Communication & Society, European Journal of Public Health and Behavioral Sleep Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact