Kathleen A. Leppig
- Genetics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Christine M. DistècheM. William LenschPhillip D. SwansonShannon J. OdelbergThomas D. BirdBrooke SmithPhillip F. ChanceNorisada Matsunami
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (16 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (13 papers)Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Kathleen A. Leppig
55 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Genetics 681
- Molecular Biology 662
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 507
- Neurology 310
- Neurology 219
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen A. Leppig
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen A. Leppig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen A. Leppig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen A. Leppig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen A. Leppig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen A. Leppig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen A. Leppig. The network helps show where Kathleen A. Leppig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen A. Leppig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen A. Leppig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen A. Leppig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen A. Leppig. Kathleen A. Leppig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Implementation matters: How patient experiences differ when genetic counseling accompanies the return of genetic variants of uncertain significance | 0 |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 81 | |
| 12 | 77 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 84 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Kathleen A. Leppig
Kathleen A. Leppig is a scholar working on Genetics, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (16 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (13 papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (507 citations), Neurology (219 citations) and Genetics (681 citations). Kathleen A. Leppig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Christine M. Distèche, M. William Lensch, Phillip D. Swanson, Shannon J. Odelberg, Thomas D. Bird, Brooke Smith, Phillip F. Chance, Norisada Matsunami, Cristina I. Cann and Lewis B. Holmes. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.