Katherine Seaton

716 total citations
32 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Katherine Seaton is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Geometry and Topology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine Seaton has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 12 papers in Geometry and Topology and 10 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Katherine Seaton's work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (11 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (8 papers). Katherine Seaton is often cited by papers focused on Theoretical and Computational Physics (13 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (11 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (8 papers). Katherine Seaton collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United States. Katherine Seaton's co-authors include Lisa Hackett, Paul A. Pearce, S. Ole Warnaar, Bernard Nienhuis, Jean Armstrong, Murray T. Batchelor, Bernard Nienhuis, John C. Galati, J. A. Simpson and K. J. Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

In The Last Decade

Katherine Seaton

31 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine Seaton Australia 10 175 166 137 104 59 32 468
Doochul Kim South Korea 13 37 0.2× 249 1.5× 305 2.2× 136 1.3× 147 2.5× 28 807
Steven R. Finch United States 7 55 0.3× 69 0.4× 63 0.5× 19 0.2× 2 0.0× 23 407
Alexander E. Holroyd United States 14 34 0.2× 91 0.5× 162 1.2× 7 0.1× 12 0.2× 57 628
Stephen Kirkland Canada 14 258 1.5× 55 0.3× 3 0.0× 53 0.5× 10 0.2× 53 657
Vlada Limic United States 12 32 0.2× 78 0.5× 189 1.4× 9 0.1× 6 0.1× 25 674
Hannu Reittu Finland 12 65 0.4× 212 1.3× 36 0.3× 95 0.9× 4 0.1× 34 467
Pierluigi Contucci Italy 15 11 0.1× 240 1.4× 312 2.3× 45 0.4× 7 0.1× 69 609
Peter Mörters United Kingdom 14 45 0.3× 195 1.2× 118 0.9× 12 0.1× 7 0.1× 64 651
Lisa Lorentzen Norway 8 57 0.3× 43 0.3× 9 0.1× 39 0.4× 3 0.1× 27 379
Ben Mestel United Kingdom 10 39 0.2× 110 0.7× 19 0.1× 10 0.1× 2 0.0× 33 258

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Seaton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Seaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Seaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Seaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Seaton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Seaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Seaton. The network helps show where Katherine Seaton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Seaton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Seaton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Seaton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Seaton. Katherine Seaton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seaton, Katherine, et al.. (2024). Our cheating is not your cheating: signature misconduct exemplified in mathematics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 49(7). 994–1004.
2.
Seaton, Katherine, et al.. (2023). Mathematical specification of hitomezashi designs. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts. 17(1-2). 156–177. 1 indexed citations
3.
Seaton, Katherine, et al.. (2022). Takeaways from teaching through a global pandemic – practical examples of lasting value in tertiary mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 53(3). 559–565. 4 indexed citations
4.
Seaton, Katherine. (2020). Maths exams in a time of disruption. Figshare. 2 indexed citations
5.
Seaton, Katherine. (2019). Laying groundwork for an understanding of academic integrity in mathematics tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 50(7). 1063–1072. 9 indexed citations
6.
Seaton, Katherine. (2017). Sphericons and D-forms: a crocheted connection. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts. 11(4). 187–202. 1 indexed citations
7.
Seaton, Katherine. (2015). Curriculum Redesign to Provide Opportunities for a Diversity of Students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 23(1). 1 indexed citations
8.
Seaton, Katherine. (2013). Efficacy and efficiency in formative assessment: an informed reflection on the value of partial marking. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 44(7). 963–971. 6 indexed citations
9.
Galati, John C., Katherine Seaton, K. J. Lee, J. A. Simpson, & John B. Carlin. (2012). Rounding non-binary categorical variables following multivariate normal imputation: evaluation of simple methods and implications for practice. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 84(4). 798–811. 10 indexed citations
10.
Seaton, Katherine. (2002). Ising tricriticality and the dilute A3model. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 35(7). 1597–1603. 2 indexed citations
11.
Korff, Christian & Katherine Seaton. (2002). Universal amplitude ratios and Coxeter geometry in the dilute AL model. Nuclear Physics B. 636(3). 435–464. 2 indexed citations
12.
Seaton, Katherine & Murray T. Batchelor. (2002). The dilute A4 model, the E7 mass spectrum and the tricritical Ising model. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 43(5). 2636–2653. 2 indexed citations
13.
Batchelor, Murray T. & Katherine Seaton. (1998). Correlation lengths and E8 mass spectrum of the dilute A3 lattice model. Nuclear Physics B. 520(3). 697–744. 5 indexed citations
14.
Seaton, Katherine, et al.. (1997). q-Trinomial coefficients and the dilute A model. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 30(21). 7667–7676. 4 indexed citations
15.
Batchelor, Murray T., A L Owczarek, Katherine Seaton, & C M Yung. (1995). Surface critical behaviour of an O(n) loop model related to two Manhattan lattice walk problems. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 28(4). 839–852. 5 indexed citations
16.
Warnaar, S. Ole, Paul A. Pearce, Katherine Seaton, & Bernard Nienhuis. (1994). Order parameters of the dilute A models. Journal of Statistical Physics. 74(3-4). 469–531. 39 indexed citations
17.
Warnaar, S. Ole, Bernard Nienhuis, & Katherine Seaton. (1992). New construction of solvable lattice models including an Ising model in a field. Physical Review Letters. 69(5). 710–712. 63 indexed citations
18.
Pearce, Paul A. & Katherine Seaton. (1989). Exact solution of cyclic solid-on-solid lattice models. Annals of Physics. 193(2). 326–366. 25 indexed citations
19.
Seaton, Katherine & Paul A. Pearce. (1989). Partial order in the self-dual Ashkin-Teller model. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 22(13). 2567–2576. 1 indexed citations
20.
Pearce, Paul A. & Katherine Seaton. (1988). A classical theory of hard squares. Journal of Statistical Physics. 53(5-6). 1061–1072. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026