Katherine S. Williams

500 total citations
28 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

Katherine S. Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Katherine S. Williams has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Katherine S. Williams's work include Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). Katherine S. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). Katherine S. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Katherine S. Williams's co-authors include Kimberly Johnson, Nancy Mueller, David H. Gutmann, Cecilia Diniz Behn, Amy Chesser, Carolyn R. Ahlers‐Schmidt, Ibrahim Hussain, Angelia M. Paschal, John A. Harper and Huw M. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

In The Last Decade

Katherine S. Williams

28 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katherine S. Williams United States 11 112 61 55 52 31 28 330
Willow Bryant United States 7 229 2.0× 122 2.0× 49 0.9× 93 1.8× 21 0.7× 13 457
Álvaro Mendes Portugal 14 137 1.2× 38 0.6× 79 1.4× 20 0.4× 10 0.3× 48 627
Rebecca Weiss United States 11 75 0.7× 122 2.0× 54 1.0× 10 0.2× 54 1.7× 25 380
Sohaib R. Rufai United Kingdom 10 142 1.3× 28 0.5× 22 0.4× 42 0.8× 37 1.2× 33 464
Jessica Mozersky United States 14 75 0.7× 20 0.3× 128 2.3× 9 0.2× 27 0.9× 52 631
Rebecca Robbins United States 10 67 0.6× 24 0.4× 145 2.6× 22 0.4× 20 0.6× 31 794
Rebecca Dimond United Kingdom 13 60 0.5× 22 0.4× 114 2.1× 29 0.6× 11 0.4× 32 469
Natalie Hayes United States 5 48 0.4× 126 2.1× 43 0.8× 43 0.8× 17 0.5× 5 491
José María López Piñero Spain 11 41 0.4× 40 0.7× 59 1.1× 12 0.2× 7 0.2× 104 580
Tobias Haeusermann United Kingdom 7 40 0.4× 17 0.3× 58 1.1× 12 0.2× 10 0.3× 17 258

Countries citing papers authored by Katherine S. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine S. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine S. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine S. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine S. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine S. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine S. Williams. The network helps show where Katherine S. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine S. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine S. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine S. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine S. Williams. Katherine S. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Williams, Katherine S., Timothy W. Secomb, & Ardith W. El-Kareh. (2023). An autonomous mathematical model for the mammalian cell cycle. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 569. 111533–111533. 2 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Katherine S., et al.. (2023). Ethical Considerations and Societal Impact of Personalized Advertising Algorithms. Journal of Student Research. 12(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
Williams, Katherine S., et al.. (2020). Applying Sen’s Capabilities Approach to the Delivery of Positive Youth Justice. Youth Justice. 21(1). 90–106. 2 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2018). Book review: 'tomorrow belongs to us': the British far right since 1967 edited by Nigel Copsey and Matthew Worley. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Katherine S., Timothy W. Secomb, & Ardith W. El-Kareh. (2017). Additive Damage Models for Cellular Pharmacodynamics of Radiation–Chemotherapy Combinations. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 80(5). 1236–1258. 2 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2016). Anti-Cancer Treatment and the Cell Cycle: Cellular-Level Mathematical Models. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2012). Textbook on Criminology (7th Ed). 1 indexed citations
8.
Ahlers‐Schmidt, Carolyn R., et al.. (2012). Parent Opinions About Use of Text Messaging for Immunization Reminders. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 14(3). e83–e83. 37 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2012). Textbook on Criminology. Oxford University Press eBooks. 17 indexed citations
10.
Johnson, Kimberly, et al.. (2012). Development of an international internet-based neurofibromatosis Type 1 Patient registry. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 34(2). 305–311. 30 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Katherine S. & Cecilia Diniz Behn. (2011). Dynamic Interactions between Orexin and Dynorphin May Delay Onset of Functional Orexin Effects: A Modeling Study. Journal of Biological Rhythms. 26(2). 171–181. 17 indexed citations
12.
Ahlers‐Schmidt, Carolyn R., et al.. (2010). Assessing Physician Response Rate Using a Mixed-Mode Survey. Kansas Journal of Medicine. 3(5). 1–6. 8 indexed citations
13.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2005). On-line Anonymity, Deindividuation and Freedom of Expression and Privacy. eYLS (Yale Law School). 110(3). 687. 1 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2004). Child Pornography Law: Does it Protect Children?. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 26(3). 245–261. 10 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Katherine S.. (2003). Controlling Internet Child Pornography and Protecting the Child. Information & Communications Technology Law. 12(1). 3–24. 8 indexed citations
16.
Carr, Indira & Katherine S. Williams. (2000). SECURING THE E-COMMERCE ENVIRONMENT. Computer Law & Security Report. 16(5). 295–310. 2 indexed citations
17.
Thomas, Huw M., Katherine S. Williams, & John A. Harper. (1996). Labelling telomeres of cereals, grasses and clover by primedin situ DNA labelling. Chromosome Research. 4(3). 182–184. 13 indexed citations
18.
Carr, Indira & Katherine S. Williams. (1994). Computers and law. Intellect Books. 3 indexed citations
19.
Williams, Katherine S.. (1987). Child Maltreatment and Paternal Deprivation: A Manifesto for Research, Prevention, and Treatment. DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University). 5(1). 22. 6 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Katherine S.. (1985). Offenders, Deviants, or Patients?: An Introduction to the Study of Socio-Forensic Problems. DigitalCommons - WayneState (Wayne State University). 3(1). 23. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Willow Bryant Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Álvaro Mendes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Weiss Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sohaib R. Rufai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jessica Mozersky Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Robbins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebecca Dimond Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Natalie Hayes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by José María López Piñero Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tobias Haeusermann
Rankless by CCL
2026