Natalie Hayes
About
In The Last Decade
Natalie Hayes
5 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Social Psychology 196
- Clinical Psychology 126
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 87
- Immunology 85
- Applied Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Hayes
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Hayes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Hayes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Hayes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Hayes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Hayes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Hayes. The network helps show where Natalie Hayes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Hayes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Hayes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Hayes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Hayes. Natalie Hayes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Incidence of iatrogenesis associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment of pediatric patients. | 30 |
| 3 | 312 | |
| 4 | 94 | |
| 5 | 48 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.