Katherine Papafotiou
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Co-authors
- Con StoughPhillip SwannEdward OgdenBeata Y. SilberRodney J. CroftLuke A. DowneyMartin BoormanRebecca King
- Topics
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (14 papers)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (13 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Katherine Papafotiou
16 papers receiving 570 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Pharmacology 359
- Toxicology 292
- Epidemiology 206
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 110
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 84
Countries citing papers authored by Katherine Papafotiou
This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine Papafotiou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine Papafotiou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine Papafotiou more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine Papafotiou
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine Papafotiou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine Papafotiou. The network helps show where Katherine Papafotiou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine Papafotiou
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine Papafotiou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine Papafotiou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine Papafotiou. Katherine Papafotiou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 172 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 109 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 80 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | Impairment and driving assessments of drivers given amphetamines, cannabis and benzodiazepines and oral fluid testing results | 7 |
About Katherine Papafotiou
Katherine Papafotiou is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (14 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (13 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (292 citations), Pharmacology (359 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (39 citations). Katherine Papafotiou has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Con Stough, Phillip Swann, Edward Ogden, Beata Y. Silber, Rodney J. Croft, Luke A. Downey, Martin Boorman, Rebecca King, Rebecca King and David Camfield. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Accident Analysis & Prevention and Forensic Science International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.