Katherine E. Lewis
- Education top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kevin D. O’BrienAlan ChaitThomas O. McDonaldThomas N. WightElizabeth A. KirkShari WangLahoucine HanichMelissa M. Murphy
- Topics
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (16 papers)Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (15 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Katherine E. Lewis
23 papers receiving 716 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Education 285
- Statistics and Probability 261
- Molecular Biology 176
- Surgery 166
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 122
Countries citing papers authored by Katherine E. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Katherine E. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katherine E. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katherine E. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Katherine E. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katherine E. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katherine E. Lewis. The network helps show where Katherine E. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katherine E. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katherine E. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katherine E. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katherine E. Lewis. Katherine E. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | Reconceptualizing mathematical learning disabilities: a diagnostic case study | 1 |
| 15 | Understanding Mathematical Learning Disabilities: A Case Study of Errors and Explanations. | 6 |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 92 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 139 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Katherine E. Lewis
Katherine E. Lewis is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education, having authored 24 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (16 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (15 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (261 citations), Education (285 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (122 citations). Katherine E. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kevin D. O’Brien, Alan Chait, Thomas O. McDonald, Thomas N. Wight, Elizabeth A. Kirk, Shari Wang, Lahoucine Hanich, Melissa M. Murphy, Michèle M. M. Mazzocco and Gwen F. Myers. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology and Atherosclerosis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.