Kate O’Reilly

502 total citations
26 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Kate O’Reilly is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate O’Reilly has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 8 papers in Epidemiology and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kate O’Reilly's work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). Kate O’Reilly is often cited by papers focused on Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). Kate O’Reilly collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Kate O’Reilly's co-authors include Kath Peters, Nathan J. Wilson, Michele Wiese, Peter Lewis, Julie Pryor, Lauretta Luck, Rakime Elmir, Susan McInnes, Fiona McDermid and Zhen Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Disability and Rehabilitation and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Kate O’Reilly

23 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate O’Reilly Australia 12 92 89 79 66 59 26 309
Richard Crespo United States 13 85 0.9× 182 2.0× 88 1.1× 65 1.0× 66 1.1× 17 459
Dawn M. Richardson United States 12 68 0.7× 139 1.6× 53 0.7× 20 0.3× 26 0.4× 24 347
Susan Foley United States 10 34 0.4× 150 1.7× 66 0.8× 18 0.3× 35 0.6× 35 355
Tiffany Green United States 11 116 1.3× 179 2.0× 135 1.7× 28 0.4× 15 0.3× 52 516
Joanne Wilkinson United States 10 164 1.8× 73 0.8× 143 1.8× 91 1.4× 13 0.2× 16 368
Shahzad Inayat Canada 12 57 0.6× 168 1.9× 99 1.3× 21 0.3× 42 0.7× 28 360
Mehtap Kartal Türkiye 10 40 0.4× 113 1.3× 51 0.6× 15 0.2× 26 0.4× 41 333
Mahnaz Noroozi Iran 12 153 1.7× 149 1.7× 99 1.3× 51 0.8× 13 0.2× 62 448
Gülten Koç Türkiye 9 70 0.8× 65 0.7× 63 0.8× 45 0.7× 18 0.3× 40 292
Jonetta Johnson United States 6 98 1.1× 104 1.2× 89 1.1× 22 0.3× 30 0.5× 8 418

Countries citing papers authored by Kate O’Reilly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate O’Reilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate O’Reilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate O’Reilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate O’Reilly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate O’Reilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate O’Reilly. The network helps show where Kate O’Reilly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate O’Reilly

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate O’Reilly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate O’Reilly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate O’Reilly. Kate O’Reilly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Luck, Lauretta, et al.. (2024). Men in Nursing: Let's Talk. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 82(4). 4053–4055. 2 indexed citations
2.
O’Reilly, Kate, et al.. (2024). Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure the Perception of Workplace Gender Discrimination for Women in Nursing. Nursing and Health Sciences. 26(4). e13185–e13185. 1 indexed citations
4.
Luck, Lauretta, et al.. (2023). Workplace gender discrimination in the nursing workforce—An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 32(17-18). 5693–5711. 36 indexed citations
5.
O’Reilly, Kate, Fiona McDermid, Susan McInnes, & Kath Peters. (2023). “I was just a shell”: Mental health concerns for women in perimenopause and menopause. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 33(3). 693–702. 8 indexed citations
6.
O’Reilly, Kate, Fiona McDermid, Susan McInnes, & Kath Peters. (2022). An exploration of women's knowledge and experience of perimenopause and menopause: An integrative literature review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 32(15-16). 4528–4540. 23 indexed citations
7.
O’Reilly, Kate, Nathan J. Wilson, Cannas Kwok, & Kath Peters. (2021). Women's tenacity following traumatic brain injury: Qualitative insights. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(4). 1934–1944. 4 indexed citations
8.
Peters, Kath, et al.. (2021). The experience of workplace gender discrimination for women registered nurses: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 78(6). 1743–1754. 26 indexed citations
9.
Elmir, Rakime, et al.. (2021). Women's experiences of workplace gender discrimination in nursing: An integrative review. Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia. 29(2). 188–200. 13 indexed citations
10.
Wilson, Nathan J., et al.. (2020). A national survey of nurses who care for people with intellectual and developmental disability. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 37(3). 13 indexed citations
11.
Lewis, Peter, et al.. (2019). Demographic profile of the intellectual disability nursing workforce in Australia: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability. 45(3). 264–268. 10 indexed citations
12.
Lewis, Peter, et al.. (2019). A qualitative study of nurses’ perspectives of caring for children with intellectual disability and their families in a paediatric acute care setting. Journal of Child Health Care. 23(4). 639–651. 16 indexed citations
13.
O’Reilly, Kate, Kath Peters, Nathan J. Wilson, & Cannas Kwok. (2018). Use of pragmatism to explore women’s experiences of traumatic brain injury: a kaleidoscopic view of the world. Nurse Researcher. 25(4). 21–25. 2 indexed citations
15.
O’Reilly, Kate, Peter Lewis, Michele Wiese, et al.. (2018). An exploration of the practice, policy and legislative issues of the specialist area of nursing people with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Nursing Inquiry. 25(4). e12258–e12258. 32 indexed citations
16.
Wilson, Nathan J., et al.. (2018). Nurses working in intellectual disability‐specific settings talk about the uniqueness of their role: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(4). 812–822. 26 indexed citations
17.
O’Reilly, Kate. (2017). Humor—A Rehabilitative Tool in the Post-Intensive Care of Young Adults With Acquired Brain Injury. Rehabilitation Nursing. 42(4). 230–234. 4 indexed citations
18.
O’Reilly, Kate, Julie Pryor, & Stacey George. (2015). An exploration of the post-intensive rehabilitation care of young adults with severe acquired brain injury. 18(1). 18. 3 indexed citations
19.
Allen, Jeffrey C., Kieran Hand, Jonathan Hinton, et al.. (2011). An audit of clinical outcome for patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with combinations of benzylpenicillin, chloramphenicol and doxycycline. Journal of Infection. 63(6). e56–e57. 1 indexed citations
20.
O’Reilly, Kate & Julie Pryor. (2002). Young people with brain injury in nursing homes: not the best option!. Australian Health Review. 25(3). 46–51. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026