Kate Stith
Impact in
- Law top 1%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Criminal Law and Evidence
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
- Legal and Constitutional Studies
Papers in
- Law 13
- Criminal Law and Evidence 11
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
-
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 7
- International Law and Human Rights 1
- Co-authors
- José A. CabranesJeffrey R. KlingJames M. AndersonIsh P. BhallaClaudia E. HauptLaura S. UnderkufflerRonald F. WrightKaren Dunn
- Journals
- The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (4 papers)The Yale Law Journal (3 papers)California Law Review (2 papers)The University of Chicago Law Review (1 paper)Stanford Law Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Kate Stith
25 papers receiving 357 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Law 110
- Economics and Econometrics 177
- Sociology and Political Science 270
- Clinical Psychology 83
- Toxicology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Stith
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Stith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Stith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Stith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Stith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Stith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Stith. The network helps show where Kate Stith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Kate Stith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 5 | Defining Federal Crimes | 2014 | 1 |
| 6 | The Costs of Judging Judges by the Numbers | 2010 | 3 |
| 7 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 8 | A SECOND CHANCE FOR SENTENCING REFORM: ESTABLISHING A SENTENCING AGENCY IN THE JUDICIAL BRANCH | 2005 | 0 |
| 9 | Sentencing Guidelines: Lessons for the States | 2000 | 1 |
| 10 | Measuring Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines | 1999 | 10 |
| 11 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 116 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 14 | Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts | 1998 | 116 |
| 15 | Judging Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines | 1997 | 5 |
| 16 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 18 | Criminal Sanctions in Connecticut | 1989 | 2 |
| 19 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1976 | 3 |
About Kate Stith
Kate Stith is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Toxicology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (7 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (110 citations), Economics and Econometrics (177 citations), Sociology and Political Science (270 citations), Clinical Psychology (83 citations) and Toxicology (12 citations). Kate Stith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include José A. Cabranes, Jeffrey R. Kling, James M. Anderson, Ish P. Bhalla, Claudia E. Haupt, Laura S. Underkuffler, Ronald F. Wright and Karen Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, The Yale Law Journal, California Law Review, The University of Chicago Law Review and Stanford Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.