Kate Stith

772 total citations
26 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Kate Stith is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Stith has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Law, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Kate Stith's work include Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 papers). Kate Stith is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Law and Evidence (11 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (7 papers). Kate Stith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Kate Stith's co-authors include José A. Cabranes, James M. Anderson, Jeffrey R. Kling, Claudia E. Haupt, Ish P. Bhalla, Laura S. Underkuffler, Ronald F. Wright and Karen Dunn and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Law and Economics, The Yale Law Journal and Harvard Law Review.

In The Last Decade

Kate Stith

25 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Stith United States 8 270 177 110 83 52 26 424
Octávio Luiz Motta Ferraz United Kingdom 9 228 0.8× 69 0.4× 146 1.3× 10 0.1× 40 0.8× 36 333
Rolando V. del Carmen United States 11 225 0.8× 29 0.2× 63 0.6× 59 0.7× 100 1.9× 31 324
Greg Berman United States 7 139 0.5× 17 0.1× 44 0.4× 88 1.1× 22 0.4× 11 213
Don Stemen United States 13 312 1.2× 40 0.2× 29 0.3× 121 1.5× 32 0.6× 26 352
Paula Kautt United Kingdom 10 418 1.5× 37 0.2× 43 0.4× 184 2.2× 72 1.4× 19 451
Emily Buss United States 8 123 0.5× 287 1.6× 196 1.8× 19 0.2× 111 2.1× 27 432
John Harrington United Kingdom 10 71 0.3× 24 0.1× 40 0.4× 18 0.2× 27 0.5× 46 220
Eric C. Ip Hong Kong 7 112 0.4× 38 0.2× 69 0.6× 23 0.3× 112 2.2× 55 249
Colin Harvey United Kingdom 10 197 0.7× 18 0.1× 53 0.5× 42 0.5× 166 3.2× 62 314
Karin D. Martin United States 9 297 1.1× 58 0.3× 17 0.2× 80 1.0× 82 1.6× 19 356

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Stith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Stith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Stith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Stith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Stith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Stith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Stith. The network helps show where Kate Stith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Stith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Stith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Stith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Stith. Kate Stith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stith, Kate, et al.. (2018). Buprenorphine MAT as an Imperfect Fix. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 46(2). 279–291. 4 indexed citations
2.
Stith, Kate, et al.. (2018). The Opioid Crisis and Federal Criminal Prosecution. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 46(2). 292–313. 7 indexed citations
3.
Bhalla, Ish P., et al.. (2018). The Role of Civil Commitment in the Opioid Crisis. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 46(2). 343–350. 8 indexed citations
4.
Stith, Kate, et al.. (2018). Fentanyl: A Whole New World?. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 46(2). 314–324. 29 indexed citations
5.
Stith, Kate, et al.. (2010). The Costs of Judging Judges by the Numbers. SSRN Electronic Journal. 28(2). 313. 3 indexed citations
6.
Stith, Kate. (2008). The Arc of the Pendulum: Judges, Prosecutors, and the Exercise of Discretion. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stith, Kate. (2008). The Arc of the Pendulum: Judges, Prosecutors, and the Exercise of Discretion. The Yale Law Journal. 117(7). 1420–1420. 31 indexed citations
8.
Stith, Kate & Karen Dunn. (2005). A SECOND CHANCE FOR SENTENCING REFORM: ESTABLISHING A SENTENCING AGENCY IN THE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Stanford Law Review. 58(1). 217–234.
9.
Stith, Kate. (2004). Crime and Punishment under the Constitution. The Supreme Court Review. 2004. 221–269. 2 indexed citations
10.
Stith, Kate. (2003). Panel I: Disparity in Sentencing—Race and Gender. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 15(3). 160–164. 3 indexed citations
11.
Stith, Kate. (2000). Sentencing Guidelines: Lessons for the States. 1 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, James M., Jeffrey R. Kling, & Kate Stith. (1999). Measuring Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations
13.
Anderson, James M., Jeffrey R. Kling, & Kate Stith. (1999). Measuring Interjudge Sentencing Disparity: Before and After the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Journal of Law and Economics. 42(S1). 271–308. 116 indexed citations
14.
Wright, Ronald F., Kate Stith, & José A. Cabranes. (1999). Rules for Sentencing Revolutions. The Yale Law Journal. 108(6). 1355–1355. 3 indexed citations
15.
Stith, Kate & José A. Cabranes. (1999). To Fear Judging No More: Recommendations for the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 11(4). 187–193. 2 indexed citations
16.
Cabranes, José A. & Kate Stith. (1998). Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 116 indexed citations
17.
Stith, Kate & José A. Cabranes. (1997). Judging Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. 5 indexed citations
18.
Stith, Kate. (1996). The Hegemony of the Sentencing Commission. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 9(1). 14–18. 3 indexed citations
19.
Stith, Kate. (1990). The Risk of Legal Error in Criminal Cases: Some Consequences of the Asymmetry in the Right to Appeal. The University of Chicago Law Review. 57(1). 1–1. 7 indexed citations
20.
Stith, Kate & Laura S. Underkuffler. (1989). Criminal Sanctions in Connecticut. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Octávio Luiz Motta Ferraz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rolando V. del Carmen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Greg Berman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Don Stemen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paula Kautt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emily Buss Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Harrington Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eric C. Ip Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Colin Harvey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karin D. Martin
Rankless by CCL
2026