Kate O’Neill

30 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Kate O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Development 50
  • Global and Planetary Change 111
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 54
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 38
  • Political Science and International Relations 93
Replace Lorraine Elliott with:
Lorraine Elliott Australia
Hans Bruyninckx Belgium
Julian S. Yates Australia
Carole‐Anne Sénit Netherlands
Jen Iris Allan United Kingdom
Paul F. Steinberg United States
Bárbara Hogenboom Netherlands
Maria‐Therese Gustafsson Sweden
Hein‐Anton van der Heijden Netherlands
Beatriz Bustos Chile
Kate O’Neill relative to Lorraine Elliott Australia Lorraine Elliott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Lorraine Elliott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate O’Neill. The network helps show where Kate O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Kate O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200471
2 201349
3 201747
4 200939
5 200029
6 200426
7 201319
8 200519
9 201918
10 200115
11 202211
12 200310
13 19988
14 20188
15 20185
16 20055
17 19975
18 20175
19 20224
20 20073

About Kate O’Neill

Kate O’Neill is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Strategy and Management, having authored 33 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers), Municipal Solid Waste Management (4 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (3 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (3 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (3 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (3 papers), Intellectual Property Law (3 papers) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (50 citations), Global and Planetary Change (111 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (54 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (38 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (93 citations). Kate O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Stacy D. VanDeveer, Jörg Balsiger, Erika Weinthal, Peter M. Haas, Michael W. Stone, Steven Bernstein, Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya, Avery Cohn, Benjamin Cashore and Thijs Van de Graaf. Their work appears in journals such as Global Environmental Politics, California Law Review, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development and International Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact