Global Environmental Politics

819 papers and 22.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 819 papers published in Global Environmental Politics in the last decades have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Environmental Politics usually cover Global and Planetary Change (274 papers), Sociology and Political Science (261 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (218 papers) specifically the topics of Climate Change Policy and Economics (193 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (165 papers) and International Development and Aid (111 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Environmental Politics are Karin Bäckstrand, Radoslav S. Dimitrov, Peter Newell, Michael Maniates, Aarti Gupta, Lars H. Gulbrandsen, Jennifer Clapp, Frank Biermann, Michele M. Betsill and Liliana B. Andonova.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Environmental Politics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Environmental Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Environmental Politics.

Countries where authors publish in Global Environmental Politics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Environmental Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Environmental Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Environmental Politics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025