Kate Murray

1.1k citations
46 papers · 596 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Kate Murray

39 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Kate Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Clinical Psychology 230
  • General Health Professions 228
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 90
  • Safety Research 57
Replace Laura J. Finan with:
Laura J. Finan United States
Christopher P. Salas‐Wright United States
Stephen R. Shamblen United States
Amy L. Bernard United States
Hollie Hix‐Small United States
Yunting Zheng China
Hilary F. Byrnes United States
Margaret R. Kuklinski United States
Nicole R. Morgan United States
Carin Staland‐Nyman Sweden
Kate Murray relative to Laura J. Finan United States Laura J. Finan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Laura J. Finan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Murray. The network helps show where Kate Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Murray Line = papers co-authored together Kate Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 201851
3 201748
4 202045
5 201644
6 201740
7 201832
8 201332
9 202225
10 201925
11 201824
12 202023
13 202121
14 201820
15 202020
16 201616
17 201712
18 20209
19 20198
20 20185

About Kate Murray

Kate Murray is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Education, having authored 46 papers that have together received 596 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (13 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (4 papers), Physical Activity and Health (4 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (4 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (230 citations), General Health Professions (228 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (90 citations) and Safety Research (57 citations). Kate Murray has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ignacio Correa‐Velez, Caroline Lenette, Robert Schweitzer, Mark Brough, Jane Shakespeare‐Finch, Lyn Vromans, J. Aaron Hipp, Camille Nebeker, Christina K. Holub and Suneeta Godbole. Their work appears in journals such as Health & Social Care in the Community, Traumatology An International Journal, Psychotherapy Research, Children and Youth Services Review and Australian Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact