Kate Malleson
- Law top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Peter H. RussellPatrick O’BrienRuth MacKenzieRobert HazellPhilippe SandsRichard BaldwinMartín Cave
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (13 papers)Legal principles and applications (6 papers)Discrimination and Equality Law (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Malleson
25 papers receiving 204 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Law 173
- Gender Studies 75
- Political Science and International Relations 67
- Sociology and Political Science 59
- Economics and Econometrics 25
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Malleson
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Malleson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Malleson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Malleson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Malleson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Malleson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Malleson. The network helps show where Kate Malleson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Malleson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Malleson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Malleson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Malleson. Kate Malleson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | The Evolving Role of the UK Supreme Court | 2 |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | Creating a judicial appointments commission: which model works best? | 3 |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | Streamlining and clarifying the appellate process | 1 |
| 17 | Factors Affecting the Decision to Apply for Silk and Judicial Office | 5 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | The new judiciary: the effects of expansion and activism | 20 |
| 20 | 6 |
About Kate Malleson
Kate Malleson is a scholar working on Law, Strategy and Management and Religious studies, having authored 27 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (13 papers), Legal principles and applications (6 papers) and Discrimination and Equality Law (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (173 citations), Gender Studies (75 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (67 citations). Kate Malleson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter H. Russell, Patrick O’Brien, Ruth MacKenzie, Robert Hazell, Philippe Sands, Richard Baldwin and Martín Cave. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and Society, Modern Law Review and International and Comparative Law Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.