Kate Faasse

3.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
85 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Kate Faasse is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Faasse has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 papers in Clinical Psychology and 23 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Kate Faasse's work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (29 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (16 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers). Kate Faasse is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Placebo Effect (29 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (16 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (13 papers). Kate Faasse collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Kate Faasse's co-authors include Keith J. Petrie, Jill M. Newby, Leslie R. Martin, Andrew Grey, Samantha Tang, Helen Christensen, Kathleen O’Moore, Tim Cundy, Rob Horne and Andrew L. Geers and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ and Nutrients.

In The Last Decade

Kate Faasse

78 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemi... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Faasse Australia 27 789 629 544 427 425 85 2.6k
Guido Van Hal Belgium 31 269 0.3× 603 1.0× 230 0.4× 293 0.7× 214 0.5× 221 3.0k
Pallab K Maulik India 30 282 0.4× 1.3k 2.1× 381 0.7× 219 0.5× 208 0.5× 109 4.0k
Denise de Ridder Netherlands 31 164 0.2× 955 1.5× 387 0.7× 417 1.0× 263 0.6× 78 3.9k
Jonathan Ives United Kingdom 28 238 0.3× 483 0.8× 226 0.4× 330 0.8× 231 0.5× 97 2.5k
Kristen Pickles Australia 19 126 0.2× 398 0.6× 328 0.6× 302 0.7× 193 0.5× 60 2.4k
Fiona C Warren United Kingdom 33 277 0.4× 1.7k 2.7× 397 0.7× 227 0.5× 238 0.6× 115 4.3k
Stéphane Legleye France 30 170 0.2× 772 1.2× 149 0.3× 653 1.5× 186 0.4× 137 3.3k
Howard Brody United States 33 430 0.5× 379 0.6× 567 1.0× 187 0.4× 485 1.1× 113 3.6k
R. Christopher Sheldrick United States 28 725 0.9× 1.7k 2.6× 568 1.0× 111 0.3× 229 0.5× 106 3.2k
Bin Xie United States 38 128 0.2× 1.2k 2.0× 488 0.9× 530 1.2× 217 0.5× 143 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Faasse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Faasse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Faasse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Faasse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Faasse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Faasse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Faasse. The network helps show where Kate Faasse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Faasse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Faasse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Faasse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Faasse. Kate Faasse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vartanian, Lenny R., et al.. (2025). Flexible or rigid control of eating scale: development and validation of the FORCES in women. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 22(1). 45–45. 1 indexed citations
2.
Faasse, Kate, et al.. (2025). The effect of attribute framing on beliefs and attitudes toward branded and generic medications. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 48(3). 523–535.
3.
Barnes, Kirsten, et al.. (2024). Assessing the longevity of attribute framing in attenuating the nocebo effect to brand and generic medication. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being. 16(4). 2026–2047. 1 indexed citations
4.
Barnes, Kirsten, et al.. (2023). The role of positive information provision in open‐label placebo effects. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being. 15(4). 1406–1426. 8 indexed citations
5.
Barnes, Kirsten, et al.. (2023). Practitioner warmth and empathy attenuates the nocebo effect and enhances the placebo effect. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being. 16(2). 421–441. 8 indexed citations
6.
Faasse, Kate, et al.. (2023). Influence of side effect information on patient willingness to take medication: consequences for informed consent and medication adherence. Internal Medicine Journal. 53(9). 1692–1696. 5 indexed citations
7.
Tang, Samantha, Natalie Anderson, Kate Faasse, William P. Adams, & Jill M. Newby. (2021). A Qualitative Study on the Experiences of Women With Breast Implant Illness. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 42(4). 381–393. 10 indexed citations
8.
Geers, Andrew L., et al.. (2020). Affect and emotions in placebo and nocebo effects: What do we know so far?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 15(1). 30 indexed citations
9.
Newby, Jill M., Kathleen O’Moore, Samantha Tang, Helen Christensen, & Kate Faasse. (2020). Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0236562–e0236562. 323 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Vartanian, Lenny R., et al.. (2020). Development of a scale to measure reasons for eating less healthily after exercise: the compensatory unhealthy eating scale. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. 8(1). 110–131. 4 indexed citations
11.
Karantanis, Emmanuel, et al.. (2019). Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire. International Urogynecology Journal. 31(3). 521–528. 6 indexed citations
12.
Faasse, Kate & Leslie R. Martin. (2018). The Power of Labeling in Nocebo Effects. International review of neurobiology. 139. 379–406. 16 indexed citations
13.
Martin, Leslie R., et al.. (2018). A perspective on nonadherence to drug therapy: psychological barriers and strategies to overcome nonadherence. Patient Preference and Adherence. Volume 12. 1527–1535. 33 indexed citations
14.
Faasse, Kate, et al.. (2017). Enhancing treatment effectiveness through social modelling: A pilot study. Psychology and Health. 32(5). 626–637. 10 indexed citations
15.
Faasse, Kate, et al.. (2016). A comparison of language use in pro- and anti-vaccination comments in response to a high profile Facebook post,. Vaccine. 34(47). 5808–5814. 101 indexed citations
16.
Faasse, Kate, et al.. (2015). Perceptions of generic medication in the general population, doctors and pharmacists: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 5(12). e008915–e008915. 130 indexed citations
17.
Grey, Andrew, et al.. (2015). 3-D bone models to improve treatment initiation among patients with osteoporosis: A randomised controlled pilot trial. Psychology and Health. 31(4). 487–497. 12 indexed citations
18.
Petrie, Keith J., Kate Faasse, Fiona Crichton, & Andrew Grey. (2014). How common are symptoms? Evidence from a New Zealand national telephone survey. BMJ Open. 4(6). e005374–e005374. 95 indexed citations
19.
20.
Faasse, Kate, Greg Gamble, Tim Cundy, & Keith J. Petrie. (2012). Impact of television coverage on the number and type of symptoms reported during a health scare: a retrospective pre–post observational study. BMJ Open. 2(4). e001607–e001607. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026