Karine Côté-Boucher
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Demography
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Federica InfantinoMark B. SalterSusan BraedleyClifford ShearingBenoît DupontAnthony AmicelleSally ChiversMireille Paquet
- Topics
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers)Policing Practices and Perceptions (4 papers)Global Security and Public Health (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Sociology and Political SciencePolitical Science and International RelationsClinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Karine Côté-Boucher
11 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Sociology and Political Science 279
- Political Science and International Relations 123
- Clinical Psychology 60
- Demography 27
- General Health Professions 23
Countries citing papers authored by Karine Côté-Boucher
This map shows the geographic impact of Karine Côté-Boucher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karine Côté-Boucher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karine Côté-Boucher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karine Côté-Boucher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karine Côté-Boucher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karine Côté-Boucher. The network helps show where Karine Côté-Boucher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karine Côté-Boucher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karine Côté-Boucher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karine Côté-Boucher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karine Côté-Boucher. Karine Côté-Boucher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | Border Frictions: Gender, Generation and Technology on the Frontline | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 162 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Border Security as Practice: Security Dialogue Special Issue 45(3), 45 | 0 |
| 16 | 49 |
About Karine Côté-Boucher
Karine Côté-Boucher is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 16 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (4 papers) and Global Security and Public Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (279 citations), Political Science and International Relations (123 citations) and Clinical Psychology (60 citations). Karine Côté-Boucher has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Federica Infantino, Mark B. Salter, Susan Braedley, Clifford Shearing, Benoît Dupont, Anthony Amicelle, Sally Chivers, Mireille Paquet and Tamara Daly. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Criminology, Journal of Aging Studies and Theoretical Criminology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.