Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
20041.6k citationsRod S Taylor, Shah Ebrahim et al.profile →
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
20111.4k citationsShah Ebrahim, T Moxham et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease
20161.3k citationsLindsey Anderson, Neil Oldridge et al.Journal of the American College of Cardiologyprofile →
Exercise-based rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
2001680 citationsKaren Rees, David R. Thompson et al.profile →
Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2008590 citationsAndrew D Beswick, Karen Rees et al.profile →
Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese children from the age of 6 to 11 years
2017397 citationsKaren Rees, Lena Al-Khudairy et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
2016355 citationsLindsey Anderson, David R. Thompson et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure
2019353 citationsLinda Long, Ify Mordi et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese adolescents aged 12 to 17 years
2017342 citationsLena Al-Khudairy, Louisa Ells et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review
2018306 citationsVictoria Houlden, Scott Weich et al.PLoS ONEprofile →
Mediterranean-style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
2019267 citationsKaren Rees, Andrea Takeda et al.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewsprofile →
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis
2023199 citationsGrace Dibben, James Faulkner et al.European Heart Journalprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Rees more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Rees. The network helps show where Karen Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Rees
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Rees.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Rees based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Rees. Karen Rees is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dibben, Grace, James Faulkner, Neil Oldridge, et al.. (2023). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 44(6). 452–469.199 indexed citations breakdown →
Houlden, Victoria, Scott Weich, João Porto de Albuquerque, Stephen A. Jarvis, & Karen Rees. (2018). The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 13(9). e0203000–e0203000.306 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Anderson, Lindsey, Neil Oldridge, David R. Thompson, et al.. (2016). Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 67(1). 1–12.1306 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Rees, Karen, et al.. (2015). Abstract P263: Central Obesity and the Emerging Epidemic of Type 2 Diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Circulation. 131.5 indexed citations
13.
Rees, Karen, Nadine Flowers, Louise Hartley, et al.. (2013). Abstract P404: "Mediterranean" Dietary Pattern for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cochrane Systematic Review. Circulation. 127.16 indexed citations
14.
Rees, Karen, Louise Hartley, Camilla Day, Aileen Clarke, & Saverio Stranges. (2013). Abstract P405: Selenium Supplementation for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cochrane Systematic Review. Circulation. 127.20 indexed citations
Taylor, Fiona, Andrew D Beswick, Karen Rees, et al.. (2005). Audit of cardiac rehabilitation in light of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease. British Journal of Cardiology. 12(1). 50–52.2 indexed citations
18.
Griebsch, Ingolf, Jackie Brown, Andrew D Beswick, et al.. (2004). Is provision and funding of cardiac rehabilitation services sufficient for the achievement of the National Service Framework goals. British Journal of Cardiology. 11(4). 307–309.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.