Hannah Ewald

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
50 papers, 952 citations indexed

About

Hannah Ewald is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Economics and Econometrics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Ewald has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 952 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 13 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 9 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Hannah Ewald's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (19 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (6 papers). Hannah Ewald is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (19 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (6 papers). Hannah Ewald collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Canada. Hannah Ewald's co-authors include Lars G. Hemkens, Matthias Briel, Heiner C. Bucher, Christian Appenzeller‐Herzog, Julian Hirt, Viktoria Gloy, John P. A. Ioannidis, Rémy Boscacci, Heike Raatz and Hansjakob Furrer and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMJ and The Journal of Urology.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Ewald

47 papers receiving 933 citations

Hit Papers

Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of mis... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Ewald Switzerland 18 184 157 132 124 123 50 952
Marien González‐Lorenzo Italy 19 270 1.5× 176 1.1× 110 0.8× 115 0.9× 294 2.4× 42 1.6k
M. Sanni Ali United Kingdom 19 193 1.0× 98 0.6× 207 1.6× 121 1.0× 138 1.1× 45 1.2k
Beth Woods United Kingdom 15 179 1.0× 112 0.7× 370 2.8× 142 1.1× 187 1.5× 59 1.5k
Élodie Perrodeau France 21 81 0.4× 237 1.5× 205 1.6× 67 0.5× 99 0.8× 43 1.3k
Nawar Diar Bakerly United Kingdom 16 110 0.6× 150 1.0× 106 0.8× 176 1.4× 76 0.6× 49 937
Annalisa Rosso Italy 18 194 1.1× 157 1.0× 126 1.0× 98 0.8× 201 1.6× 56 885
Belchin Kostov Spain 26 253 1.4× 221 1.4× 97 0.7× 136 1.1× 211 1.7× 77 1.9k
Nicole White Australia 18 123 0.7× 101 0.6× 93 0.7× 176 1.4× 67 0.5× 88 1.1k
Carolina Riveros France 13 93 0.5× 219 1.4× 179 1.4× 142 1.1× 129 1.0× 26 1.0k
Sarah Edwards United Kingdom 18 160 0.9× 596 3.8× 222 1.7× 149 1.2× 412 3.3× 66 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Ewald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Ewald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Ewald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Ewald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Ewald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Ewald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Ewald. The network helps show where Hannah Ewald may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Ewald

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Ewald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Ewald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Ewald. Hannah Ewald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ebrahimi, Fahim, Ramin Ebrahimi, Marc A. Beer, et al.. (2025). Colchicine for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2025(11). CD014808–CD014808.
2.
Hirt, Julian, et al.. (2024). Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching: the TARCiS statement. BMJ. 385. e078384–e078384. 29 indexed citations
3.
Mündermann, Annegret, Corina Nüesch, Hannah Ewald, & Ilse Jonkers. (2024). Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: Biomechanics. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 32(12). 1530–1541. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hirt, Julian, et al.. (2023). Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review. Research Synthesis Methods. 14(3). 563–579. 35 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hirt, Julian, Hannah Ewald, Matthias Briel, & Stefan Schandelmaier. (2023). Searching a methods topic: practical challenges and implications for search design. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 166. 111201–111201. 4 indexed citations
7.
Ewald, Hannah, et al.. (2023). Ex-vivo experimental strategies for assessing unconstrained shoulder biomechanics: a scoping review protocol. F1000Research. 11. 77–77. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hirt, Julian, et al.. (2022). Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: a scoping review. medRxiv. 2 indexed citations
9.
Ewald, Hannah, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, et al.. (2022). Searching two or more databases decreased the risk of missing relevant studies: a metaresearch study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 149. 154–164. 82 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Signorell, Aita, Christian Appenzeller‐Herzog, Hannah Ewald, et al.. (2021). Methodological approaches for conducting follow-up research with clinical trial participants: a scoping review and expert interviews. Trials. 22(1). 961–961. 4 indexed citations
12.
Cord, Kimberly A. Mc, Hannah Ewald, Arnav Agarwal, et al.. (2021). Treatment effects in randomised trials using routinely collected data for outcome assessment versus traditional trials: meta-research study. BMJ. 372. n450–n450. 27 indexed citations
14.
Ewald, Hannah, Irma Klerings, Gernot Wagner, et al.. (2020). Abbreviated and comprehensive literature searches led to identical or very similar effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 128. 1–12. 15 indexed citations
15.
Appenzeller‐Herzog, Christian, et al.. (2019). Comparative effectiveness of common therapies for Wilson disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled studies. Liver International. 39(11). 2136–2152. 34 indexed citations
16.
Ewald, Hannah, et al.. (2019). Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 118. 29–41. 13 indexed citations
17.
Speich, Benjamin, Viktoria Gloy, Nadine Schur, et al.. (2019). A scoping review shows that several nonvalidated budget planning tools for randomized trials are available. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 117. 9–19. 6 indexed citations
18.
Cord, Kimberly A. Mc, Hannah Ewald, Matthias Briel, et al.. (2019). Current use and costs of electronic health records for clinical trial research: a descriptive study. CMAJ Open. 7(1). E23–E32. 37 indexed citations
19.
Ewald, Hannah, et al.. (2016). The Clinical Effectiveness of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international. 113(9). 139–46. 29 indexed citations
20.
Ewald, Hannah, Joanna Kirby, Karen Rees, & Wendy Robertson. (2013). Parent-only interventions in the treatment of childhood obesity: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Public Health. 36(3). 476–489. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026