Karen Huhn
- Family Practice top 2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 12
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 2
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders 3
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 11
-
- Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation 4
-
- Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare 4
-
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 3
-
- Resilience and Mental Health 3
Karen Huhn
19 papers receiving 747 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Family Practice 137
- Rehabilitation 270
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 99
- Psychiatry and Mental health 299
- Occupational Therapy 75
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Huhn
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Huhn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Huhn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Huhn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Huhn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Huhn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Huhn. The network helps show where Karen Huhn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Karen Huhn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 70 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 67 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 16 | Construct validity of the Health Science Reasoning Test. | 2011 | 22 |
| 17 | 2011 | 17 | |
| 18 | Using a Web-Based Patient Simulation Program to Teach Clinical Reasoning to Physical Therapy Students: Feasibility and Pilot Studies | 2008 | 1 |
| 19 | Use of a Low-Cost, Commercially Available Gaming Console (Wii) for Rehabilitation of an Adolescent With Cerebral Palsybreakdown → | 2008 | 501 |
| 20 | 2007 | 23 |
About Karen Huhn
Karen Huhn is a scholar working on Family Practice, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Leadership and Management, having authored 21 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (12 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (137 citations), Rehabilitation (270 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (99 citations). Karen Huhn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Judith E. Deutsch, Lisa Black, Susan Wainwright, Jennifer Furze, J. Scott Parrott, Gail M. Jensen, Marjorie Johnson Hilliard, Ellen Costello, Margaret M. Plack and Joyce Maring.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.