Karen Ackroff

3.9k total citations
100 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Karen Ackroff is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Karen Ackroff has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 87 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics, 70 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and 36 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Karen Ackroff's work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (87 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (70 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (35 papers). Karen Ackroff is often cited by papers focused on Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (87 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (70 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (35 papers). Karen Ackroff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Karen Ackroff's co-authors include Anthony Sclafani, Steven Zukerman, Nada A. Abumrad, François Lucas, Gary J. Schwartz, Khalid Touzani, Michael Vigorito, F. Lucas, Katherine L. Tucker and John I. Glendinning and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, International Journal of Obesity and American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology.

In The Last Decade

Karen Ackroff

100 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Karen Ackroff United States 33 2.4k 1.8k 1.1k 612 532 100 3.2k
Alan C. Spector United States 48 4.3k 1.8× 1.9k 1.1× 3.4k 3.1× 1.0k 1.7× 1.4k 2.7× 177 6.3k
Steven D. Munger United States 28 1.9k 0.8× 497 0.3× 1.9k 1.7× 198 0.3× 972 1.8× 52 2.9k
Susan E. Swithers United States 23 1.2k 0.5× 839 0.5× 228 0.2× 552 0.9× 142 0.3× 57 2.1k
Israel Ramírez United States 27 847 0.4× 768 0.4× 268 0.2× 703 1.1× 211 0.4× 85 1.8k
Maria G. Veldhuizen United States 25 962 0.4× 354 0.2× 860 0.8× 277 0.5× 214 0.4× 50 2.0k
Ichiro Sakata Japan 33 2.0k 0.8× 2.9k 1.6× 138 0.1× 1.8k 3.0× 363 0.7× 100 4.1k
Bhavik P. Shah United States 14 832 0.4× 1.6k 0.9× 142 0.1× 798 1.3× 438 0.8× 21 2.3k
J. Louis-Sylvestre France 32 856 0.4× 1.1k 0.6× 199 0.2× 1.2k 2.0× 151 0.3× 72 2.7k
Patricia S. Grigson United States 36 1.1k 0.5× 708 0.4× 633 0.6× 409 0.7× 2.3k 4.3× 141 3.8k
Diego V. Bohórquez United States 16 545 0.2× 510 0.3× 214 0.2× 597 1.0× 263 0.5× 20 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Ackroff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Ackroff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Ackroff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Ackroff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Ackroff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Ackroff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Ackroff. The network helps show where Karen Ackroff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Ackroff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Ackroff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Ackroff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Ackroff. Karen Ackroff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (2024). Glucose appetition in C57BL/6J mice: Influence of nonnutritive sweetener experience, food deprivation state and sex differences. Physiology & Behavior. 283. 114596–114596. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (2022). Fat preference deficits and experience-induced recovery in global taste-deficient Trpm5 and Calhm1 knockout mice. Physiology & Behavior. 246. 113695–113695. 6 indexed citations
3.
Berthoud, Hans‐Rudolf, Christopher D. Morrison, Karen Ackroff, & Anthony Sclafani. (2021). Learning of food preferences: mechanisms and implications for obesity & metabolic diseases. International Journal of Obesity. 45(10). 2156–2168. 46 indexed citations
4.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (2017). Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice. Physiology & Behavior. 173. 188–199. 15 indexed citations
5.
Ackroff, Karen & Anthony Sclafani. (2016). Flavor Preferences Conditioned by Dietary Glutamate. Advances in Nutrition. 7(4). 845S–852S. 12 indexed citations
6.
Ackroff, Karen & Anthony Sclafani. (2016). Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited. Physiology & Behavior. 165. 286–290. 6 indexed citations
7.
Sclafani, Anthony, Khalid Touzani, & Karen Ackroff. (2015). Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice. Physiology & Behavior. 147. 141–148. 13 indexed citations
8.
Sclafani, Anthony, Philippe Marambaud, & Karen Ackroff. (2014). Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice. Physiology & Behavior. 126. 25–29. 34 indexed citations
9.
Ackroff, Karen & Anthony Sclafani. (2011). Rats' preferences for high fructose corn syrup vs. sucrose and sugar mixtures. Physiology & Behavior. 102(5). 548–552. 14 indexed citations
10.
Ackroff, Karen, et al.. (2011). The CS–US delay gradient in flavor preference conditioning with intragastric carbohydrate infusions. Physiology & Behavior. 105(2). 168–174. 8 indexed citations
11.
Ackroff, Karen, et al.. (2009). Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiology & Behavior. 99(3). 402–411. 64 indexed citations
12.
Ackroff, Karen, et al.. (2009). Rapid acquisition of conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Physiology & Behavior. 97(3-4). 406–413. 40 indexed citations
13.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (2006). Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and incentive value measured by progressive ratio licking in rats. Physiology & Behavior. 88(1-2). 88–94. 25 indexed citations
14.
Ackroff, Karen, F. Lucas, & Anthony Sclafani. (2005). Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source. Physiology & Behavior. 85(4). 448–460. 32 indexed citations
15.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (2004). The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited. Physiology & Behavior. 82(1). 89–95. 66 indexed citations
16.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (2003). Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat. Physiology & Behavior. 79(4-5). 663–670. 107 indexed citations
17.
Sclafani, Anthony & Karen Ackroff. (1993). Deprivation alters rats' flavor preferences for carbohydrates and fats. Physiology & Behavior. 53(6). 1091–1099. 35 indexed citations
18.
Ackroff, Karen, et al.. (1993). The Rat's Preference for Sucrose, Polycose and their Mixtures. Appetite. 21(1). 69–80. 23 indexed citations
19.
Sclafani, Anthony, et al.. (1993). Feeding Response of Rats to No‐Fat and High‐Fat Cakes. Obesity Research. 1(3). 173–178. 8 indexed citations
20.
Ackroff, Karen. (1992). Foraging for macronutrients: Effects of protein availability and abundance. Physiology & Behavior. 51(3). 533–542. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026