Kamila E. Sip

621 total citations
9 papers, 376 citations indexed

About

Kamila E. Sip is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kamila E. Sip has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 376 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kamila E. Sip's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). Kamila E. Sip is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (5 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). Kamila E. Sip collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom. Kamila E. Sip's co-authors include Andreas Roepstorff, William B. McGregor, Chris Frith, Mauricio R. Delgado, David V. Smith, Emily Stern, Mikkel Wallentin, Jennifer L. Marchant, Joshua Skewes and Stephan F. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Neuropsychologia and Human Brain Mapping.

In The Last Decade

Kamila E. Sip

9 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kamila E. Sip United States 8 266 260 154 49 45 9 376
Andreas Hula Austria 8 125 0.5× 62 0.2× 72 0.5× 73 1.5× 34 0.8× 18 266
Jungang Qin China 10 267 1.0× 205 0.8× 40 0.3× 89 1.8× 43 1.0× 15 407
Giuseppe Ugazio Switzerland 7 346 1.3× 176 0.7× 35 0.2× 60 1.2× 99 2.2× 16 450
Anna Foerster Germany 13 239 0.9× 151 0.6× 41 0.3× 55 1.1× 56 1.2× 33 335
Ala Yankouskaya United Kingdom 13 237 0.9× 104 0.4× 35 0.2× 137 2.8× 46 1.0× 44 396
Amanda Markey United States 3 267 1.0× 77 0.3× 55 0.4× 110 2.2× 43 1.0× 3 334
Kirsten I. Ruys Netherlands 13 321 1.2× 227 0.9× 25 0.2× 102 2.1× 92 2.0× 21 470
Robert Wirth Germany 14 381 1.4× 246 0.9× 35 0.2× 91 1.9× 80 1.8× 42 511
Xiuyan Guo China 15 332 1.2× 86 0.3× 52 0.3× 183 3.7× 84 1.9× 47 490
Sofie Cromheeke Belgium 7 178 0.7× 35 0.1× 76 0.5× 104 2.1× 32 0.7× 8 342

Countries citing papers authored by Kamila E. Sip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kamila E. Sip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kamila E. Sip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kamila E. Sip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kamila E. Sip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kamila E. Sip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kamila E. Sip. The network helps show where Kamila E. Sip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kamila E. Sip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kamila E. Sip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kamila E. Sip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kamila E. Sip. Kamila E. Sip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Sip, Kamila E., Richard Gonzalez, Stephan F. Taylor, & Emily Stern. (2018). Increased Loss Aversion in Unmedicated Patients with Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 8. 25 indexed citations
2.
Sip, Kamila E., Alexandra F. Muratore, & Emily Stern. (2016). Effects of context on risk taking and decision times in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 75. 82–90. 15 indexed citations
3.
Smith, David V., Kamila E. Sip, & Mauricio R. Delgado. (2015). Functional connectivity with distinct neural networks tracks fluctuations in gain/loss framing susceptibility. Human Brain Mapping. 36(7). 2743–2755. 24 indexed citations
4.
Sip, Kamila E., David V. Smith, Anthony J. Porcelli, Kohitij Kar, & Mauricio R. Delgado. (2014). Social closeness and feedback modulate susceptibility to the framing effect. Social Neuroscience. 10(1). 35–45. 26 indexed citations
5.
Sip, Kamila E., David Carmel, Jennifer L. Marchant, et al.. (2013). When Pinocchio's nose does not grow: belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7. 16–16. 24 indexed citations
6.
Sip, Kamila E., Joshua Skewes, Jennifer L. Marchant, et al.. (2012). What if I Get Busted? Deception, Choice, and Decision-Making in Social Interaction. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 6. 58–58. 35 indexed citations
7.
Sip, Kamila E., et al.. (2010). The production and detection of deception in an interactive game. Neuropsychologia. 48(12). 3619–3626. 60 indexed citations
8.
Sip, Kamila E., Andreas Roepstorff, William B. McGregor, & Chris Frith. (2008). Response to Haynes: There's more to deception than brain activity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12(4). 127–128. 7 indexed citations
9.
Sip, Kamila E., Andreas Roepstorff, William B. McGregor, & Chris Frith. (2008). Detecting deception: the scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12(2). 48–53. 160 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026