1.8k total citations 74 papers, 1.4k citations indexed
About
Kadriye Sorkun is a scholar working on Insect Science, Food Science and Pharmacology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Kadriye Sorkun has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Insect Science, 28 papers in Food Science and 14 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Kadriye Sorkun's work include Bee Products Chemical Analysis (65 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (43 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (27 papers). Kadriye Sorkun is often cited by papers focused on Bee Products Chemical Analysis (65 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (43 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (27 papers). Kadriye Sorkun collaborates with scholars based in Türkiye, Austria and Serbia. Kadriye Sorkun's co-authors include Bekir Salih, Aslı Özkök, Ataç Uzel, Özant Önçağ, Dilşah Çoğulu, Nesrin Ecem Bayram, Dürdane Kolankaya, Güldeniz Selmanoğlu, Ömür Gençay and Yusuf Can Gerçek and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Food Chemistry and Journal of Endodontics.
In The Last Decade
Kadriye Sorkun
71 papers
receiving
1.3k citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kadriye Sorkun
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kadriye Sorkun's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kadriye Sorkun with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kadriye Sorkun more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kadriye Sorkun. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kadriye Sorkun. The network helps show where Kadriye Sorkun may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kadriye Sorkun
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kadriye Sorkun.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kadriye Sorkun based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kadriye Sorkun. Kadriye Sorkun is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2018). A New Record for Propolis Substitute: Pruning Sealer. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 18(1). 36–39.2 indexed citations
3.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2018). Plant Origins of Propolis from Hakkari, Turkey. DergiPark (Istanbul University).1 indexed citations
4.
Özkök, Aslı, et al.. (2018). Monofloral Features of Turkish Honeys According to Mellissopalynologic, Total Phenolic Acid and Total Flavonoid Content. Gazi university journal of science. 31(3). 713–723.3 indexed citations
5.
Demiralp, Duygu Özel, et al.. (2017). Protein Analysis of Anzer Bee Pollen by Bradford Method. 17(1). 21–32.4 indexed citations
6.
Özkök, Aslı, et al.. (2017). Dioxin analysis in pine honey from Turkey. Acta Biologica Szegediensis. 61(1). 69–75.2 indexed citations
Bayram, Sinan, Nesrin Ecem Bayram, Yusuf Can Gerçek, & Kadriye Sorkun. (2016). Anticytotoxic and Antimutagenic Effects of Propolis on Human Lymphocytes In Vitro. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 16(2). 38–46.5 indexed citations
9.
Kolankaya, Dürdane, et al.. (2015). The Effects of Pollen on Serum Parameters, and Liver and Kidney Tissues of Rats. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
10.
Bayram, Nesrin Ecem, Mehmet Karadayı, Medine Güllüce, et al.. (2015). Genotoxic and antigenotoxic evaluation of propolis by using in vitro bacterial assay systems.. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 15(1). 29–36.4 indexed citations
11.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2015). Saf ve Sahte Balların Ayırt Edilmesinde Fiziksel, Kimyasal ve Palinolojik Kriterlerin Saptanması. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
12.
Bayram, Nesrin Ecem, et al.. (2013). Determination of major compounds in some Turkish propolis.. 13(26). 3–9.2 indexed citations
Kılıç, Abdullah, Orhan Bedir, Özgür Koru, et al.. (2010). In vitro activity of Turkish propolis samples against anaerobic bacteria causing oral cavity infections.. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi. 16(2). 293–298.9 indexed citations
15.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2007). The investigation of moisture and fat analysis of economically important pollen grains collected by Apis mellifera L.. 7. 9–15.2 indexed citations
16.
Önçağ, Özant, Dilşah Çoğulu, Ataç Uzel, & Kadriye Sorkun. (2006). Evaluation of in vitro antimicrobial activity of various propolis samples against Enterococcus faecalis. 10(2). 122–125.4 indexed citations
17.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2006). Protein analysis with kjeldahl of pollen grains collected by Apis mellifera L.. 6. 7–11.3 indexed citations
18.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2002). Türkiye' de üretilen doğal ve yapay balların ayırt edilmesinde fiziksel, kimyasal ve mikroskobik analizler. 2(4). 13–21.2 indexed citations
19.
Sorkun, Kadriye, et al.. (2001). Türkiye'nin Ege, Marmara, Akdeniz ve Karadeniz Bölgelerinde toplanmış ballarda polen analizi. 1(1). 2–12.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.