K. R. Peel

23 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

K. R. Peel
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Internal Medicine 48
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 88
  • Reproductive Medicine 77
  • Epidemiology 163
  • Urology 19
Replace A. Sullivan with:
A. Sullivan United Kingdom
Lisa N. Abaid United States
D.M. Paternoster Italy
Murat Gök Türkiye
Theodore Ross Canada
M. Bürger Germany
Eli Westerlund Sweden
Martin Baunacke Germany
David Hazzan Israel
Delia Maria Paternoster Italy
K. R. Peel relative to A. Sullivan United Kingdom A. Sullivan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.6×
A. Sullivan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. R. Peel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. R. Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. R. Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. R. Peel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. R. Peel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. R. Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. R. Peel. The network helps show where K. R. Peel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. R. Peel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. R. Peel Line = papers co-authored together K. R. Peel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984106
2 200466
3 199356
4 198055
5 196626
6 196924
7 197923
8 198019
9 198519
10 197018
11 200018
12 199417
13
Lymphocele.
199316
14 19909
15 19808
16 19888
17 19948
18 19917
19 19944
20
Intra-operative diagnosis of lymph node metastases in gynaecological practice using imprint cytology.
19893

About K. R. Peel

K. R. Peel is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Internal Medicine and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (1 paper) and Birth, Development, and Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (48 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (88 citations), Reproductive Medicine (77 citations), Epidemiology (163 citations) and Urology (19 citations). K. R. Peel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include C. A. Joslin, Alex J. Crandon, J. A. Anderson, G. P. McNicol, Nick P. Johnson, Jonathan M. Sutton, Richard James Lilford, Jim Thornton, T. E. Blecher and W.M. Edgar. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Cytopathology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, The Lancet and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact