K. R. Lewis
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Bernard JohnB. JohnRalph RileyC. D. DarlingtonJ. P. MossGiacomo DiazS. A. HendersonG. G. E. Scudder
- Topics
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (10 papers)Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
K. R. Lewis
53 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Plant Science 998
- Molecular Biology 575
- Genetics 521
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 366
- Insect Science 95
Countries citing papers authored by K. R. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of K. R. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. R. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. R. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. R. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. R. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. R. Lewis. The network helps show where K. R. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. R. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. R. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. R. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. R. Lewis. K. R. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | The organization of heredity. | 1 |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | The Evolution of Chromosome Systems | 4 |
| 8 | Genetic systems in Allium. II. Sex differences in meiosis. | 20 |
| 9 | The role of polyploidy in the evolution of a tropical flora. | 15 |
| 10 | DEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHESIS AND CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE. | 9 |
| 11 | 90 | |
| 12 | Some recent data on accessory chromosomes in Secale and Poa. | 9 |
| 13 | The adaptive significance of B-chromosomes in rye. | 39 |
| 14 | Seed germination and B-chromosomes in the leek (Allium porrum). | 13 |
| 15 | The chromosomes as we see them. | 1 |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About K. R. Lewis
K. R. Lewis is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Parasitology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (10 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (998 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (366 citations) and Genetics (521 citations). K. R. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bernard John, B. John, Ralph Riley, C. D. Darlington, J. P. Moss, Giacomo Diaz, S. A. Henderson, G. G. E. Scudder, Oswaldo Frota‐Pessoa and J. A. Burns. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.