John J. McCusker
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Anthropology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Russell R. MenardRichard Brinsley SheridanMichael MerrillJan de VriesEdwin J. PerkinsJack P. GreeneAlice Hanson JonesJames C. Riley
- Topics
- Historical Economic and Social Studies (17 papers)Colonialism, slavery, and trade (9 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
John J. McCusker
61 papers receiving 668 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Economics and Econometrics 548
- Anthropology 357
- Sociology and Political Science 199
- Political Science and International Relations 174
- Marketing 119
Countries citing papers authored by John J. McCusker
This map shows the geographic impact of John J. McCusker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. McCusker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. McCusker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John J. McCusker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. McCusker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. McCusker. The network helps show where John J. McCusker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. McCusker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. McCusker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. McCusker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. McCusker. John J. McCusker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | History of world trade since 1450 | 7 |
| 3 | Atlantic History: Concepts and Contours | 16 |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About John J. McCusker
John J. McCusker is a scholar working on Anthropology, Economics and Econometrics and Music, having authored 66 papers that have together received 974 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (17 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (9 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (357 citations), Economics and Econometrics (548 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (109 citations). John J. McCusker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Russell R. Menard, Richard Brinsley Sheridan, Michael Merrill, Jan de Vries, Edwin J. Perkins, Jack P. Greene, Alice Hanson Jones, James C. Riley, Lorena S. Walsh and John H. Munro. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Economica and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.