K. J. McDowell
Impact in
- Equine top 0.5%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 1%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Papers in
- Equine 13
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research 13
-
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 18
- Co-authors
- Dan C. SharpW.W. ThatcherDaniel C. SharpC. B. BakerC.J. WilcoxBożena SzafrańskaSancai XieJonathan A. Green
- Journals
- Equine Veterinary Journal (6 papers)Biology of Reproduction (5 papers)Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (4 papers)Journal of Animal Science (3 papers)Reproduction (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUkraineUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
K. J. McDowell
36 papers receiving 772 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Equine 271
- Agronomy and Crop Science 506
- Small Animals 92
- Reproductive Medicine 73
- Immunology 174
Countries citing papers authored by K. J. McDowell
This map shows the geographic impact of K. J. McDowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. J. McDowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. J. McDowell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K. J. McDowell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. J. McDowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. J. McDowell. The network helps show where K. J. McDowell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. J. McDowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 50 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 31 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 79 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 28 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 29 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 24 |
About K. J. McDowell
K. J. McDowell is a scholar working on Equine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Microbiology, Small Animals and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 808 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (18 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (13 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (6 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (5 papers), Helminth infection and control (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (4 papers) and Botanical Research and Chemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (271 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (506 citations), Small Animals (92 citations), Reproductive Medicine (73 citations) and Immunology (174 citations). K. J. McDowell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ukraine and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dan C. Sharp, W.W. Thatcher, Daniel C. Sharp, C. B. Baker, C.J. Wilcox, Bożena Szafrańska, Sancai Xie, Jonathan A. Green, R. Michael Roberts and T.V. Little. Their work appears in journals such as Equine Veterinary Journal, Biology of Reproduction, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, Journal of Animal Science and Reproduction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.