K. Günther

884 total citations
31 papers, 591 citations indexed

About

K. Günther is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Günther has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 591 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 13 papers in Materials Chemistry and 9 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in K. Günther's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (13 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers). K. Günther is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (13 papers) and Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (8 papers). K. Günther collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Ukraine. K. Günther's co-authors include M. Glugla, R.‐D. Penzhorn, A. Herrmann, T. Richter, M. Kaufmann, W. Junker, R. Schneider, H.-S. Bosch, G. Pautasso and S. Welte and has published in prestigious journals such as Catalysis Today, Journal of Nuclear Materials and Nuclear Fusion.

In The Last Decade

K. Günther

30 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K. Günther Germany 14 372 355 140 97 85 31 591
R. M. Mayo United States 14 175 0.5× 199 0.6× 92 0.7× 233 2.4× 114 1.3× 52 635
N. den Harder Germany 11 364 1.0× 263 0.7× 163 1.2× 337 3.5× 52 0.6× 39 773
A. Iwamae Japan 13 183 0.5× 261 0.7× 23 0.2× 213 2.2× 119 1.4× 45 654
H.G. Esser Germany 16 478 1.3× 355 1.0× 110 0.8× 135 1.4× 9 0.1× 39 593
Minseok Kim South Korea 15 230 0.6× 138 0.4× 25 0.2× 85 0.9× 75 0.9× 52 576
U. Moser Switzerland 13 81 0.2× 488 1.4× 30 0.2× 51 0.5× 103 1.2× 45 766
M. Kato Japan 11 86 0.2× 97 0.3× 95 0.7× 44 0.5× 9 0.1× 41 331
S. Elmore United Kingdom 13 268 0.7× 389 1.1× 77 0.6× 56 0.6× 125 1.5× 31 474
W.R. Koppers Netherlands 13 238 0.6× 138 0.4× 34 0.2× 167 1.7× 9 0.1× 26 486
Takemasa Shibata Japan 12 122 0.3× 160 0.5× 97 0.7× 226 2.3× 23 0.3× 77 512

Countries citing papers authored by K. Günther

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Günther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Günther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Günther more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Günther

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Günther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Günther. The network helps show where K. Günther may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Günther

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Günther. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Günther based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Günther. K. Günther is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Demange, D., M. Glugla, K. Günther, et al.. (2010). Counter-current isotope swamping in a membrane reactor: The PERMCAT process and its applications in fusion technology. Catalysis Today. 156(3-4). 140–145. 27 indexed citations
2.
Günther, K., Steve Lange, & Markus Veit. (2009). A rapid method for determining 89Sr and 90Sr by Cerenkov counting. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 67(5). 781–785. 20 indexed citations
3.
Demange, D., et al.. (2009). Calibrating a gas chromatograph to measure tritium using calorimetry. Fusion Engineering and Design. 84(7-11). 1073–1075. 6 indexed citations
4.
Bornschein, B., et al.. (2007). Experimental validation of a method for performance monitoring of the impurity processing stage in the TEP system of ITER. Fusion Engineering and Design. 82(15-24). 2133–2139. 4 indexed citations
5.
Bornschein, B., et al.. (2005). Successful Experimental Verification of the Tokamak Exhaust Processing Concept of ITER with the CAPER Facility. Fusion Science & Technology. 48(1). 11–16. 35 indexed citations
6.
Bornschein, B., et al.. (2005). Memory Effects in Measurements of Low Tritium Concentrations as Required for the Outlet of the TEP System of the ITER Fuel Cycle. Fusion Science & Technology. 48(1). 55–58. 3 indexed citations
7.
Glugla, M., et al.. (2002). Use of Gas Chromatography in the Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe. Fusion Science & Technology. 41(3P2). 515–519. 6 indexed citations
8.
Budny, R., B. Alper, D. Borba, et al.. (2002). Local physics basis of confinement degradation in JET ELMy H mode plasmas and implications for tokamak reactors. Nuclear Fusion. 42(1). 66–75. 4 indexed citations
9.
Lässer, R., C. Caldwell-Nichols, L. Dörr, et al.. (2001). Analytic of tritium-containing gaseous species at the Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe. Fusion Engineering and Design. 58-59. 411–415. 13 indexed citations
10.
Lässer, R., et al.. (2001). Experimental validation of main components of the Tokamak exhaust process for ITER-FEAT. Fusion Engineering and Design. 58-59. 371–375. 6 indexed citations
11.
Breger, P., et al.. (1999). Modelling of passive charge exchange emission and neutral background density deduction in JET. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 41(8). 985–1004. 25 indexed citations
12.
Lingertat, J., V. Bhatnagar, G. D. Conway, et al.. (1999). The edge operational space in JET. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 266-269. 124–130. 22 indexed citations
13.
Herrmann, A., W. Junker, K. Günther, et al.. (1995). Energy flux to the ASDEX-Upgrade diverter plates determined by thermography and calorimetry. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 37(1). 17–29. 170 indexed citations
14.
Günther, K.. (1990). Theoretical Study of a Biased Single Probe in the Presence of a Strong Magnetic Field. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 30(1). 51–57. 12 indexed citations
15.
Laux, M., H. Grote, K. Günther, et al.. (1989). Results from a double-sided langmuir probe in T-10, and an extended model of a probe in a streaming magnetized plasma. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 162-164. 200–207. 20 indexed citations
16.
Penzhorn, R.‐D., Rafael Rodríguez, M. Glugla, et al.. (1988). A Catalytic Plasma Exhaust Purification System. Fusion Technology. 14(2P2A). 450–455. 32 indexed citations
17.
Günther, K.. (1988). Analytical Solutions for a Simple Sorafe‐Off Layer (SOL) and the 3‐D Treatment of A Sol with Symmetry‐Breaking Limiter Configurations. Contributions to Plasma Physics. 28(4-5). 365–372. 5 indexed citations
18.
Grashin, S.A., et al.. (1987). Thermal load of a scoop limiter with changeable geometry. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 145-147. 789–792. 12 indexed citations
19.
Alexander, K.F., et al.. (1986). Langmuir probe measurements in the limiter shadow of T-10: Non-linear scaling of edge density with central plasma density. Nuclear Fusion. 26(12). 1575–1590. 13 indexed citations
20.
Günther, K.. (1976). The So-called Track Theory of Survival is Wrong When Applied to Neutrons. International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics Chemistry and Medicine. 30(5). 495–498.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026