K Endo
About
In The Last Decade
K Endo
5 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Pharmaceutical Science 212
- Molecular Medicine 115
- Food Science 83
- Plant Science 62
- Biomaterials 58
Countries citing papers authored by K Endo
This map shows the geographic impact of K Endo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K Endo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K Endo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by K Endo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K Endo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K Endo. The network helps show where K Endo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K Endo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K Endo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K Endo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K Endo. K Endo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 57 | |
| 3 | 100 | |
| 4 | 141 | |
| 5 | Oral sustained release of theophylline from thermally reversible xyloglucan gels in rabbits. | 1 |
| 6 | 30 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.