K. Brecht

64 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

K. Brecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 137
  • Equine 10
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 32
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 68
  • Nephrology 24
Replace U. Peiper with:
U. Peiper Germany
R. N. SPEDEN Australia
G. W. Mainwood Canada
H. Aars Norway
A. F. Fukunaga United States
Einar Jebens Norway
Jane D. Lowdon United States
D. Parsons United States
Philippe R. Housmans United States
L.‐O. Nordesjö Sweden
K. Brecht relative to U. Peiper Germany U. Peiper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
U. Peiper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Brecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Brecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Brecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Brecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Brecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Brecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Brecht. The network helps show where K. Brecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside K. Brecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Brecht Line = papers co-authored together K. Brecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195260
2 195248
3 196841
4 198524
5 195322
6 196121
7 196119
8 196119
9 196315
10 195515
11 195314
12 196414
13 196314
14 196113
15
[ON ALTERATION OF VASOMOTOR ACTION BY CA++ AND K+ IONS. A CONTRIBUTION TO THE TONE PROBLEM].
196413
16 195312
17 196811
18
The effect of potassium, catecholamines and other vasoactive agents on isolated arterial segments of the muscular type.
196910
19 19529
20 19529

About K. Brecht

K. Brecht is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Physiology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical and Chemical Research (9 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (9 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (3 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (137 citations), Equine (10 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (32 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (68 citations) and Nephrology (24 citations). K. Brecht has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include P. Pauschinger, Hildegard Portzehl, Courtney M. Johnson, W Weise, H. Lorković, H. Bartels, H. Sommerkamp, K Riegel, Peter Hilpert and Aaron S. Goetz. Their work appears in journals such as Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Journal of Molecular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Die Naturwissenschaften and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact