Jürgen Dingel
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Software top 5%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- David GarlanDavid NotkinSomesh JhaZinovy DiskinCraig A. DamonGehan SelimLucio LeviJames R. Cordy
- Topics
- Formal Methods in Verification (7 papers)Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesLuxembourg
In The Last Decade
Jürgen Dingel
13 papers receiving 158 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Artificial Intelligence 99
- Software 88
- Information Systems 78
- Computer Networks and Communications 77
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 45
Countries citing papers authored by Jürgen Dingel
This map shows the geographic impact of Jürgen Dingel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jürgen Dingel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jürgen Dingel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jürgen Dingel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jürgen Dingel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jürgen Dingel. The network helps show where Jürgen Dingel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jürgen Dingel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jürgen Dingel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jürgen Dingel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jürgen Dingel. Jürgen Dingel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | Finding and Fixing Bugs in Model Transformations with Formal Verification: An Experience Report. | 1 |
| 3 | Contract-Based Specification and Analysis of AADL Models. | 1 |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | A Survey of Using Model-Based Testing to Improve Quality Attributes in Distributed Systems. | 1 |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 32 |
About Jürgen Dingel
Jürgen Dingel is a scholar working on Software, Hardware and Architecture and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (7 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (88 citations), Information Systems (78 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (77 citations). Jürgen Dingel has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include David Garlan, David Notkin, Somesh Jha, Zinovy Diskin, Craig A. Damon, Gehan Selim, Lucio Levi, James R. Cordy, Benoît Combemale and Yves Le Traon. Their work appears in journals such as Software & Systems Modeling, Formal Aspects of Computing and The Journal of Object Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.