Formal Aspects of Computing

915 papers and 7.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 915 papers published in Formal Aspects of Computing in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Formal Aspects of Computing usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (585 papers), Artificial Intelligence (581 papers) and Software (256 papers) specifically the topics of Formal Methods in Verification (517 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (369 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Formal Aspects of Computing are Bengt Jönsson, Hans Hansson, Murdoch J. Gabbay, J. C. M. Baeten, Andrew M. Pitts, J. A. Bergstra, Matthew Hennessy, Jim Woodcock, A. Prasad Sistla and Egon Börger.

In The Last Decade

Formal Aspects of Computing

798 papers receiving 7.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Formal Aspects of Computing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Formal Aspects of Computing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Formal Aspects of Computing.

Countries where authors publish in Formal Aspects of Computing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Formal Aspects of Computing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Formal Aspects of Computing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Formal Aspects of Computing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026