Jun Maeda

3.8k citations
111 papers · 2.7k indexed · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Jun Maeda

101 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Jun Maeda
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Microbiology 23
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 862
  • Molecular Biology 1.1k
  • Epidemiology 482
  • Neurology 112
Replace Seung Min Kim with:
Seung Min Kim South Korea
Yoshimasa Mori Japan
Rachel Grossman Israel
Jerzy Hildebrand Belgium
Yukihiro Yoshida Japan
Jacob Schneiderman Israel
Herbert H. Engelhard United States
Ryuta Saito Japan
N. Scott Litofsky United States
John A. Boockvar United States
Jun Maeda relative to Seung Min Kim South Korea Seung Min Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Seung Min Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jun Maeda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jun Maeda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jun Maeda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jun Maeda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jun Maeda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jun Maeda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jun Maeda. The network helps show where Jun Maeda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jun Maeda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jun Maeda Line = papers co-authored together Jun Maeda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003202
2 2004185
3 2005129
4 1981123
5 2010119
6 2011115
7 201099
8 201090
9 201080
10 200775
11 200068
12 200666
13 199865
14 201061
15 200855
16 198752
17 201045
18 200543
19 198243
20 201142

About Jun Maeda

Jun Maeda is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Oncology, having authored 111 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (15 papers), Congenital heart defects research (11 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (6 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (6 papers) and Membrane Separation Technologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (23 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (862 citations), Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Epidemiology (482 citations) and Neurology (112 citations). Jun Maeda has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Hiroyuki Yamagishi, Masahiko Higashiyama, Ken Kodama, Deepak Srivastava, Chihiro Yamagishi, Jiro Okami, John McAnally, Tonghuan Hu, Toshiteru Tokunaga and Tomio Nakayama. Their work appears in journals such as Lung Cancer, Heart and Vessels, Surgery Today, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact