Julius Wishner

24 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Julius Wishner
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • General Psychology 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 85
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
Replace Frank Auld with:
Frank Auld Canada
Robert A. Hogan United States
William E. Broen United States
J. C. Read United Kingdom
Benjamin Pope United States
Joel Greenspoon United States
Randall B. Martin United States
Vittorio F. Guidano Italy
John Lambie United Kingdom
Gerald S. Blum United States
Julius Wishner relative to Frank Auld Canada Frank Auld's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Frank Auld · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Wishner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Wishner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Wishner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Wishner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Wishner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Wishner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Wishner. The network helps show where Julius Wishner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Julius Wishner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Wishner Line = papers co-authored together Julius Wishner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196092
2 197453
3 197833
4 195732
5 197531
6 195729
7 195527
8 195314
9 197713
10 197112
11 19548
12 19627
13 19727
14 19627
15 19596
16 19785
17 19685
18 19653
19 19723
20 19633

About Julius Wishner

Julius Wishner is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (85 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations). Julius Wishner has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Otto F. Wahl, D. R. Rutter, Thomas E. Shipley, Arthur Burton, Robert E. Harris, Marvin Hurvich, Murray Levine, Robert B. Cairns, Paul James and Harold D. Fishbein. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Psychology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Applied Psychology, Psychological Review and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact