Julius Wess

7.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Julius Wess is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Mathematical Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Julius Wess has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 23 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 11 papers in Mathematical Physics. Recurrent topics in Julius Wess's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (20 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). Julius Wess is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (20 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). Julius Wess collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Julius Wess's co-authors include Jonathan Bagger, Bruno Zumino, Peter Schupp, Stuart Samuel, Marija Dimitrijević Ćirić, Paolo Aschieri, Branislav Jurčo, Frank Meyer, Burt A. Ovrut and Christian Blohmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Journal of High Energy Physics.

In The Last Decade

Julius Wess

44 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Supersymmetry and Supergravity

1983 1.0k citations Julius Wess, Jonathan Bagger Princeton University Press eBooks profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julius Wess Germany	23	2.2k	1.4k	1.1k	519	370	45	2.7k
L. Bonora Italy	27	1.9k 0.9×	1.2k 0.9×	764 0.7×	573 1.1×	302 0.8×	142	2.4k
Krzysztof Pilch United States	27	2.3k 1.0×	1.3k 0.9×	1.6k 1.5×	421 0.8×	274 0.7×	63	2.6k
Sergio Cecotti Italy	32	2.7k 1.2×	1.4k 1.0×	1.1k 1.0×	1.1k 2.0×	458 1.2×	77	3.2k
J. Madore France	25	1.9k 0.8×	1.9k 1.4×	1.0k 0.9×	489 0.9×	588 1.6×	93	2.6k
Timothy J. Hollowood United Kingdom	28	2.5k 1.1×	1.6k 1.1×	1.4k 1.2×	807 1.6×	188 0.5×	115	3.0k
B. Juliá France	19	3.7k 1.7×	1.9k 1.3×	2.1k 1.9×	392 0.8×	252 0.7×	31	3.9k
Marcus Spradlin United States	34	3.0k 1.4×	910 0.6×	1.1k 1.0×	605 1.2×	195 0.5×	76	3.4k
Pietro Fré Italy	28	2.4k 1.1×	1.4k 1.0×	1.5k 1.3×	327 0.6×	254 0.7×	158	2.5k
Ralph Blumenhagen Germany	34	3.8k 1.7×	1.2k 0.8×	2.4k 2.2×	592 1.1×	389 1.1×	94	4.2k
Riccardo D’Auria Italy	36	3.7k 1.7×	2.1k 1.5×	2.2k 2.0×	688 1.3×	369 1.0×	151	4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Wess

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Wess's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Wess with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Wess more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Wess

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Wess. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Wess. The network helps show where Julius Wess may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julius Wess

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julius Wess. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julius Wess based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julius Wess. Julius Wess is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Wess, Julius & Jonathan Bagger. (2020). Supersymmetry and Supergravity. Princeton University Press eBooks. 69 indexed citations

2.

Aschieri, Paolo, Marija Dimitrijević Ćirić, P. P. Kulish, Fedele Lizzi, & Julius Wess. (2009). Noncommutative Spacetimes. Lecture notes in physics. 45 indexed citations

3.

Wess, Julius. (2006). Einstein-Riemann Gravity on Deformed Spaces. Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications. 4 indexed citations

4.

Aschieri, Paolo, Marija Dimitrijević Ćirić, Frank Meyer, S. Schraml, & Julius Wess. (2006). Twisted Gauge Theories. Letters in Mathematical Physics. 78(1). 61–71. 55 indexed citations

5.

Ćirić, Marija Dimitrijević & Julius Wess. (2004). Deformed bialgebra of diffeomorphisms. CERN Bulletin. 1 indexed citations

6.

Buschhorn, G. & Julius Wess. (2004). Fundamental Physics — Heisenberg and Beyond. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 11 indexed citations

7.

Wess, Julius. (2004). Deformed Coordinate Spaces; Derivatives. CERN Bulletin. 122–128. 9 indexed citations

8.

Jurčo, Branislav, Peter Schupp, & Julius Wess. (2002). Noncommutative Line Bundle and Morita Equivalence. Letters in Mathematical Physics. 61(3). 171–186. 30 indexed citations

9.

Jurčo, Branislav, Peter Schupp, & Julius Wess. (2000). Noncommutative gauge theory for Poisson manifolds. Nuclear Physics B. 584(3). 784–794. 58 indexed citations

10.

Wess, Julius. (1999). Introduction to Quantum Groups. 15–15. 3 indexed citations

11.

Wess, Julius & V. P. Akulov. (1998). Supersymmetry and Quantum Field Theory. Lecture notes in physics. 30 indexed citations

12.

Wess, Julius & Bruno Zumino. (1991). Covariant differential calculus on the quantum hyperplane. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 18(2). 302–312. 297 indexed citations

13.

Wess, Julius. (1987). Supersymmetry and supergravity. Nuclear Physics B. 294. 1185–1186. 40 indexed citations

14.

Bagger, Jonathan & Julius Wess. (1987). Gauging the supersymmetric sigma model with a goldstone field. Physics Letters B. 199(2). 243–246. 6 indexed citations

15.

Samuel, Stuart & Julius Wess. (1984). Secret supersymmetry. Nuclear Physics B. 233(3). 488–510. 22 indexed citations

16.

Wess, Julius & Jonathan Bagger. (1983). Supersymmetry and Supergravity. Princeton University Press eBooks. 1016 indexed citations breakdown →

17.

Samuel, Stuart & Julius Wess. (1983). Realistic model building with the Akulov-Volkov superfield and supergravity. Nuclear Physics B. 226(2). 289–298. 24 indexed citations

18.

Wess, Julius & Jonathan Bagger. (1982). SUPERSYMMETRY AND SUPERGRAVITY: NOTES FROM LECTURES GIVEN AT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY. PART 1.. 34 indexed citations

19.

Ovrut, Burt A. & Julius Wess. (1982). SupersymmetricRξgauge and radiative symmetry breaking. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 25(2). 409–426. 48 indexed citations

20.

Wess, Julius, et al.. (1979). New Phenomena in Lepton-Hadron Physics. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact