Julie C. Coultas

653 total citations
9 papers, 408 citations indexed

About

Julie C. Coultas is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie C. Coultas has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 408 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Julie C. Coultas's work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Julie C. Coultas is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Julie C. Coultas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Sweden. Julie C. Coultas's co-authors include Kimmo Eriksson, Pontus Strimling, Keith Lewin, Mícheál de Barra, Harry Torrance, Rosemary Luckin and Benedict du Boulay and has published in prestigious journals such as Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Evolution and Human Behavior and Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

In The Last Decade

Julie C. Coultas

8 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julie C. Coultas United Kingdom	8	249	125	108	68	54	9	408
Daisuke Nakanishi Japan	6	248 1.0×	93 0.7×	119 1.1×	30 0.4×	84 1.6×	25	397
Maria Fusaro United States	11	154 0.6×	145 1.2×	76 0.7×	70 1.0×	12 0.2×	35	624
Bernard Personnaz France	9	255 1.0×	201 1.6×	6 0.1×	45 0.7×	15 0.3×	21	462
Minoru Karasawa Japan	8	271 1.1×	232 1.9×	6 0.1×	59 0.9×	18 0.3×	37	447
Luc Faucher Canada	8	140 0.6×	93 0.7×	16 0.1×	121 1.8×	18 0.3×	38	401
Bill Ellis United States	11	427 1.7×	78 0.6×	66 0.6×	13 0.2×	6 0.1×	40	732
Tim Cole United States	7	234 0.9×	227 1.8×	6 0.1×	31 0.5×	17 0.3×	14	490
Nava Caluori United States	9	126 0.5×	126 1.0×	6 0.1×	58 0.9×	55 1.0×	15	308
Mark Evans Slovenia	7	183 0.7×	113 0.9×	7 0.1×	68 1.0×	11 0.2×	27	387
Alexandra G. Russell United States	6	307 1.2×	202 1.6×	4 0.0×	54 0.8×	14 0.3×	6	458

Countries citing papers authored by Julie C. Coultas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie C. Coultas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie C. Coultas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie C. Coultas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie C. Coultas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie C. Coultas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie C. Coultas. The network helps show where Julie C. Coultas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie C. Coultas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie C. Coultas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie C. Coultas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie C. Coultas. Julie C. Coultas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Eriksson, Kimmo, Julie C. Coultas, & Mícheál de Barra. (2016). Cross-Cultural Differences in Emotional Selection on Transmission of Information. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 16(1-2). 122–143. 21 indexed citations

2.

Eriksson, Kimmo & Julie C. Coultas. (2014). Corpses, Maggots, Poodles and Rats: Emotional Selection Operating in Three Phases of Cultural Transmission of Urban Legends. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 14(1-2). 1–26. 80 indexed citations

3.

Eriksson, Kimmo, Pontus Strimling, & Julie C. Coultas. (2014). Bidirectional associations between descriptive and injunctive norms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 129. 59–69. 133 indexed citations

4.

Eriksson, Kimmo & Julie C. Coultas. (2011). The advantage of multiple cultural parents in the cultural transmission of stories. Evolution and Human Behavior. 33(4). 251–259. 18 indexed citations

5.

Eriksson, Kimmo & Julie C. Coultas. (2009). Are people really conformist-biased? An empirical test and a new mathematical model. 7(1). 5–21. 45 indexed citations

6.

Luckin, Rosemary, et al.. (2006). How do we know if e-learning is effective?. Figshare. 2 indexed citations

7.

Coultas, Julie C.. (2004). When in Rome... An Evolutionary Perspective on Conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 7(4). 317–331. 58 indexed citations

8.

Torrance, Harry & Julie C. Coultas. (2004). Do summative assessment and testing have a positive or negative effect on post-16 learners’ motivation for learning in the learning and skills sector? A review of the research literature on assessment in post-compulsory education in the UK. 11 indexed citations

9.

Coultas, Julie C. & Keith Lewin. (2002). Who becomes a teacher? The characteristics of student teachers in four countries. International Journal of Educational Development. 22(3-4). 243–260. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact