Mícheál de Barra
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Valérie CurtisRobert AungerV. CurtisKimmo ErikssonMarijn de BruinCatriona MathesonChristine BondMarie Johnston
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers)Infection Control in Healthcare (6 papers)Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPLoS ONECochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
Mícheál de Barra
28 papers receiving 843 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Cognitive Neuroscience 428
- Social Psychology 262
- Sociology and Political Science 193
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
- General Health Professions 83
Countries citing papers authored by Mícheál de Barra
This map shows the geographic impact of Mícheál de Barra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mícheál de Barra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mícheál de Barra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mícheál de Barra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mícheál de Barra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mícheál de Barra. The network helps show where Mícheál de Barra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mícheál de Barra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mícheál de Barra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mícheál de Barra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mícheál de Barra. Mícheál de Barra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | The Italian Manifesto for the treatment of heroin addiction. The mixed care model a proposed layout for a new healthcare system for citizens with heroin addiction | 4 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Mícheál de Barra
Mícheál de Barra is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Infection Control in Healthcare (6 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (428 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (61 citations) and Sensory Systems (69 citations). Mícheál de Barra has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Valérie Curtis, Robert Aunger, V. Curtis, Kimmo Eriksson, Marijn de Bruin, Catriona Matheson, Christine Bond, Marie Johnston, Neil Scott and Claire Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.