Julian Schmitt
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Martin WeitzFrank VewingerJan KlaersTobias DammZoran HadzibabicRaphael LopesA DuprezMichael Fleischhauer
- Topics
- Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (20 papers)Strong Light-Matter Interactions (17 papers)Random lasers and scattering media (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Acoustics and UltrasonicsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsStatistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Journals
- NatureSciencePhysical Review Letters
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Julian Schmitt
24 papers receiving 936 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 891
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 183
- Artificial Intelligence 168
- Civil and Structural Engineering 144
- Biomedical Engineering 80
Countries citing papers authored by Julian Schmitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Julian Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian Schmitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julian Schmitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian Schmitt. The network helps show where Julian Schmitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julian Schmitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julian Schmitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julian Schmitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julian Schmitt. Julian Schmitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 50 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Statistical physics of Bose-condensed light in a dye microcavity | 1 |
| 19 | 69 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Julian Schmitt
Julian Schmitt is a scholar working on Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (20 papers), Strong Light-Matter Interactions (17 papers) and Random lasers and scattering media (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (52 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (891 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (183 citations). Julian Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Martin Weitz, Frank Vewinger, Jan Klaers, Tobias Damm, Zoran Hadzibabic, Raphael Lopes, A Duprez, Michael Fleischhauer, Stefan Lindén and Qi Liang. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.