Julia Spranger
Impact in
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Delphi Technique in Research
Papers in
-
- Delphi Technique in Research 6
-
- Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research 1
- Co-authors
- Marlen Niederberger (7 shared papers)Angelika Homberg (1 shared paper)Marco Sonnberger (1 shared paper)Cynthia Maddox (1 shared paper)Ute Harrison (1 shared paper)Thomas G. Blanchard (1 shared paper)Gregor Gorkiewicz (1 shared paper)W. Florian Fricke (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Systematic Reviews (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Frontiers in Public Health (1 paper)mSystems (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Julia Spranger
7 papers receiving 725 citations
Julia Spranger's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Sociology and Political Science 145
- Emergency Medical Services 20
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 10
- General Health Professions 57
- Research and Theory 2
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Spranger
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Spranger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Spranger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Spranger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Spranger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Spranger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Spranger. The network helps show where Julia Spranger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Julia Spranger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 577 |
| 2 | Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 116 |
| 3 | How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review Hit paper breakdown → | 2025 | 20 |
| 4 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 0 |
About Julia Spranger
Julia Spranger is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Delphi Technique in Research (6 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (1 paper), Language Development and Disorders (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (145 citations), Emergency Medical Services (20 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (10 citations), General Health Professions (57 citations) and Research and Theory (2 citations). Julia Spranger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marlen Niederberger, Angelika Homberg, Marco Sonnberger, Cynthia Maddox, Ute Harrison, Thomas G. Blanchard, Gregor Gorkiewicz, W. Florian Fricke, Philipp Wurm and Rainer Haas. Their work appears in journals such as Systematic Reviews, PLoS ONE, BMJ Open, Frontiers in Public Health and mSystems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.