Julia Schofield

24 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Julia Schofield
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Dermatology 143
  • Rheumatology 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 91
  • Pharmacology 83
  • Occupational Therapy 19
Replace Barbara Mathes with:
Barbara Mathes United States
I. Nasr United Kingdom
Surrinder Kaur India
Muskaan Sachdeva Canada
James Muir Australia
Recep Dursun Türkiye
Marissa J. Perman United States
Matthew Keller United States
Valerie B. Lyon United States
Nancy G. Silvis United States
Julia Schofield relative to Barbara Mathes United States Barbara Mathes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Barbara Mathes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Schofield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Schofield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Schofield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Schofield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Schofield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Schofield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Schofield. The network helps show where Julia Schofield may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Schofield, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Schofield Line = papers co-authored together Julia Schofield links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993108
2 2011100
3 199351
4 200544
5
The prognosis of occipital encephalocele.
197927
6 201523
7 200122
8 199021
9 200016
10 200613
11 201413
12 200310
13 20218
14 19958
15 19978
16 19925
17
Minocycline induced skin pigmentation.
19935
18 19915
19 20133
20
The management and effectiveness of professional and clinical networks. Final Report
20113

About Julia Schofield

Julia Schofield is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Dermatology, Oncology, Surgery and Rheumatology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 498 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (5 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (3 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (3 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (2 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (2 papers), Dermatological diseases and infestations (2 papers) and Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (143 citations), Rheumatology (120 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (91 citations), Pharmacology (83 citations) and Occupational Therapy (19 citations). Julia Schofield has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include F.M. Tatnall, Irene M. Leigh, Hywel C Williams, D Fleming, D. J. C. Grindlay, Caroline Higgins, David J. Stott, K Grice, P Maurice and Avery Maddox. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Histopathology and Journal of Medical Virology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact