Julia Ritz

411 total citations
13 papers, 98 citations indexed

About

Julia Ritz is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Ritz has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 98 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 7 papers in Language and Linguistics and 2 papers in Linguistics and Language. Recurrent topics in Julia Ritz's work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers). Julia Ritz is often cited by papers focused on Natural Language Processing Techniques (10 papers), Lexicography and Language Studies (3 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers). Julia Ritz collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and France. Julia Ritz's co-authors include Stefanie Dipper, Christian Chiarcos, Manfred Stede, Ulf Leser, Anke Lüdeling, Amir Zeldes, Svetlana Petrova, Ulrich Heid, Laurent Romary and Anne Schwarz and has published in prestigious journals such as Language Resources and Evaluation, publish.UP (University of Potsdam) and OPUS (Augsburg University).

In The Last Decade

Julia Ritz

12 papers receiving 87 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Julia Ritz Germany 5 84 28 8 7 6 13 98
Filip Klubička Ireland 7 146 1.7× 60 2.1× 12 1.5× 8 1.1× 9 1.5× 21 198
Helge Dyvik Norway 6 235 2.8× 66 2.4× 6 0.8× 11 1.6× 10 1.7× 13 250
Karel Pala Czechia 7 162 1.9× 62 2.2× 12 1.5× 8 1.1× 9 1.5× 50 173
Francesca Bertagna Italy 8 181 2.2× 48 1.7× 11 1.4× 10 1.4× 4 0.7× 22 196
Anne Vilnat France 6 95 1.1× 12 0.4× 8 1.0× 5 0.7× 4 0.7× 33 103
Anna Nedoluzhko Czechia 8 137 1.6× 40 1.4× 4 0.5× 15 2.1× 3 0.5× 30 162
Amália Mendes Portugal 7 143 1.7× 55 2.0× 5 0.6× 11 1.6× 11 1.8× 43 171
Tafseer Ahmed Germany 8 95 1.1× 37 1.3× 6 0.8× 12 1.7× 10 1.7× 16 121
Eva Vanmassenhove Netherlands 7 151 1.8× 18 0.6× 7 0.9× 5 0.7× 17 169
Manfred Sailer Germany 6 77 0.9× 77 2.8× 4 0.5× 13 1.9× 9 1.5× 25 104

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Ritz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Ritz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Ritz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Ritz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Ritz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Ritz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Ritz. The network helps show where Julia Ritz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Ritz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Ritz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Ritz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Ritz. Julia Ritz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Krause, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Topological Fields, Constituents And Coreference: A New Multi-Layer Architecture For Tüba-D/Z.. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
2.
Chiarcos, Christian, Julia Ritz, & Manfred Stede. (2011). By all these lovely tokens... Merging conflicting tokenizations. Language Resources and Evaluation. 46(1). 53–74. 6 indexed citations
3.
Zeldes, Amir, et al.. (2011). Pepper: Handling A Multiverse Of Formats. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 6 indexed citations
4.
Chiarcos, Christian, Ines Fiedler, Katharina Hartmann, et al.. (2011). Information structure in African languages: corpora and tools. Language Resources and Evaluation. 45(3). 361–374. 2 indexed citations
5.
Ritz, Julia. (2010). Using tf-idf-related Measures for Determining the Anaphoricity of Noun Phrases.. 85–92. 3 indexed citations
6.
Chiarcos, Christian, et al.. (2010). Creating and Exploiting a Resource of Parallel Parses. 166–171. 2 indexed citations
7.
Petrova, Svetlana, et al.. (2009). Building and Using a Richly Annotated Interlinear Diachronic Corpus: The Case of Old High German Tatian. OPUS (Augsburg University). 50. 47–71. 7 indexed citations
8.
Chiarcos, Christian, Ines Fiedler, Katharina Hartmann, et al.. (2009). Information structure in African languages. 17–17. 1 indexed citations
9.
Chiarcos, Christian, Julia Ritz, & Manfred Stede. (2009). By all these lovely tokens.... 35–43. 1 indexed citations
10.
Ritz, Julia, et al.. (2008). Annotation of Information Structure: an Evaluation across different Types of Texts. Language Resources and Evaluation. 19 indexed citations
11.
Chiarcos, Christian, Stefanie Dipper, Ulf Leser, et al.. (2008). A Flexible Framework for Integrating Annotations from Different Tools and Tag Sets. publish.UP (University of Potsdam). 49. 217–246. 46 indexed citations
12.
Ritz, Julia & Ulrich Heid. (2006). Extraction tools for collocations and their morphosyntactic specificities. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1925–1930. 2 indexed citations
13.
Ritz, Julia. (2006). Collocation Extraction: Needs, Feeds and Results of an Extraction System for German. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026