Julia R. Richmond

1.5k citations
20 papers · 1.0k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Julia R. Richmond

20 papers receiving 986 citations

Hit Papers

Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Order...6722020202620222024200400600

Peers

Julia R. Richmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Clinical Psychology 723
  • Applied Psychology 125
  • Health 171
  • Social Psychology 289
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 138
Replace Keith A. Edmonds with:
Keith A. Edmonds United States
Kayla M. Scamaldo United States
Carolina Ugidos Spain
Aída López-Gómez Spain
Ioannis Diakogiannis Greece
Tiago C. Zortea United Kingdom
Morica Hutchison United States
Emily Taylor United States
Dalila Talevi Italy
Sara Cloonan United States
Julia R. Richmond relative to Keith A. Edmonds United States Keith A. Edmonds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Keith A. Edmonds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia R. Richmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia R. Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia R. Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia R. Richmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia R. Richmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia R. Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia R. Richmond. The network helps show where Julia R. Richmond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Julia R. Richmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia R. Richmond Line = papers co-authored together Julia R. Richmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20231
3 20229
4 20221
5 20223
6 20217
7 20215
8 202142
9 2020103
10 202077
11 20206
12 20206
13 20206
14
Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Lifebreakdown →
2020672
15 20204
16 202010
17 201917
18 20193
19 201923
20 201915

About Julia R. Richmond

Julia R. Richmond is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (723 citations), Applied Psychology (125 citations) and Health (171 citations). Julia R. Richmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kim L. Gratz, Matthew T. Tull, Jason P. Rose, Kayla M. Scamaldo, Keith A. Edmonds, Katherine L. Dixon–Gordon, Courtney N. Forbes, Alexander L. Chapman, Sherry E. Woods and Christopher R. Berghoff. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychiatry Research and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026