Julia R. Richmond
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kim L. GratzMatthew T. TullJason P. RoseKayla M. ScamaldoKeith A. EdmondsKatherine L. Dixon–GordonCourtney N. ForbesAlexander L. Chapman
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers)COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Julia R. Richmond
20 papers receiving 986 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Clinical Psychology 723
- Social Psychology 289
- Health 171
- Sociology and Political Science 154
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 138
Countries citing papers authored by Julia R. Richmond
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia R. Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia R. Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia R. Richmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia R. Richmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia R. Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia R. Richmond. The network helps show where Julia R. Richmond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia R. Richmond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia R. Richmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia R. Richmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia R. Richmond. Julia R. Richmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 103 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Psychological Outcomes Associated with Stay-at-Home Orders and the Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Daily Lifebreakdown → | 672 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Julia R. Richmond
Julia R. Richmond is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (10 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (723 citations), Applied Psychology (125 citations) and Health (171 citations). Julia R. Richmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kim L. Gratz, Matthew T. Tull, Jason P. Rose, Kayla M. Scamaldo, Keith A. Edmonds, Katherine L. Dixon–Gordon, Courtney N. Forbes, Alexander L. Chapman, Sherry E. Woods and Christopher R. Berghoff. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychiatry Research and Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.