Juha Pohjanpelto
-
- Nonlinear Waves and Solitons 21
- Nonlinear Photonic Systems 4
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models 5
- Geometry and complex manifolds 4
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 5
- Numerical Analysis top 10%
- Numerical methods for differential equations 4
-
- Advanced Topics in Algebra 4
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 7
- Co-authors
- Peter J. OlverIan AndersonStephen C. AncoPeter GilkeyThomas BransonRaffaele VitoloJeffrey J. EarlyR. M. Samelson
- Journals
- Physics Letters A (1 paper)Transactions of the American Mathematical Society (2 papers)Journal of Mathematical Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaItaly
In The Last Decade
Juha Pohjanpelto
27 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 218
- Geometry and Topology 105
- Mathematical Physics 79
- Numerical Analysis 43
- Algebra and Number Theory 36
Countries citing papers authored by Juha Pohjanpelto
This map shows the geographic impact of Juha Pohjanpelto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juha Pohjanpelto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juha Pohjanpelto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juha Pohjanpelto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juha Pohjanpelto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juha Pohjanpelto. The network helps show where Juha Pohjanpelto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Juha Pohjanpelto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 13 | Conserved currents of massless fields of spin s | 2003 | 12 |
| 14 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 2 |
About Juha Pohjanpelto
Juha Pohjanpelto is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (21 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (5 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (5 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (4 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (4 papers) and Nonlinear Photonic Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (218 citations), Geometry and Topology (105 citations) and Mathematical Physics (79 citations). Juha Pohjanpelto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Olver, Ian Anderson, Stephen C. Anco, Peter Gilkey, Thomas Branson, Raffaele Vitolo, Jeffrey J. Early, R. M. Samelson and Stana Nikčević. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters A, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society and Journal of Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.