Judith M. E. Walsh
- Oncology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan P. TerdimanShelley R. SalpeterElizabeth GreyberE. E. SalpeterNicholas S. BuckleyThomas M. OrmistonEliseo J. Pérez‐StableStephen J. McPhee
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (26 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (20 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Judith M. E. Walsh
68 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Oncology 1.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 609
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 546
- Genetics 491
- General Health Professions 451
Countries citing papers authored by Judith M. E. Walsh
This map shows the geographic impact of Judith M. E. Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith M. E. Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith M. E. Walsh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Judith M. E. Walsh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith M. E. Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith M. E. Walsh. The network helps show where Judith M. E. Walsh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Judith M. E. Walsh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Judith M. E. Walsh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Judith M. E. Walsh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Judith M. E. Walsh. Judith M. E. Walsh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | Peer Reviewed: A Review of Studies Examining Stated Preferences for Cancer Screening | 1 |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 340 | |
| 17 | 69 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 126 | |
| 20 | 100 |
About Judith M. E. Walsh
Judith M. E. Walsh is a scholar working on Oncology, Research and Theory and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 71 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (26 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (20 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (609 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (546 citations). Judith M. E. Walsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan P. Terdiman, Shelley R. Salpeter, Elizabeth Greyber, E. E. Salpeter, Nicholas S. Buckley, Thomas M. Ormiston, Eliseo J. Pérez‐Stable, Stephen J. McPhee, Celia P. Kaplan and Ginny Gildengorin. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Annals of Internal Medicine and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.