Stephanie Van Bebber

460 total citations
10 papers, 338 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Van Bebber is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Van Bebber has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 338 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 4 papers in Oncology and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Van Bebber's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). Stephanie Van Bebber is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). Stephanie Van Bebber collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Stephanie Van Bebber's co-authors include Kathryn A. Phillips, Amalia M. Issa, Judith M. E. Walsh, Deborah A. Marshall, Julie Sakowski, David L. Veenstra, Semra Özdemir, F. Reed Johnson, Nathalie A. Kulin and John K. Marshall and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery and Health Economics.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Van Bebber

10 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers

Stephanie Van Bebber
Ameeta Parekh United States
G. Caleb Alexander United States
Edward Abrahams United States
Monica Fujii United States
Gabriella Bedarida United States
Mark Kroese United Kingdom
Joris Langedijk Netherlands
Stephanie Van Bebber
Citations per year, relative to Stephanie Van Bebber Stephanie Van Bebber (= 1×) peers Christopher‐Paul Milne

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Van Bebber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Van Bebber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Van Bebber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Van Bebber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Van Bebber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Van Bebber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Van Bebber. The network helps show where Stephanie Van Bebber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Van Bebber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Van Bebber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Van Bebber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Van Bebber. Stephanie Van Bebber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Hixson, John, Deborah E. Barnes, Karen Parko, et al.. (2015). Patients optimizing epilepsy management via an online community. Neurology. 85(2). 129–136. 30 indexed citations
2.
Marshall, Deborah A., F. Reed Johnson, Nathalie A. Kulin, et al.. (2009). How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated‐choice survey. Health Economics. 18(12). 1420–1439. 74 indexed citations
3.
Phillips, Kathryn A., et al.. (2008). Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.. PubMed. 10(3). 260–6. 26 indexed citations
4.
Issa, Amalia M., Kathryn E. Phillips, Stephanie Van Bebber, et al.. (2007). Drug Withdrawals in the United States: A Systematic Review of the Evidence and Analysis of Trends. Current Drug Safety. 2(3). 177–185. 42 indexed citations
5.
Johnson, F. Reed, et al.. (2007). PCN76 COMPARISON OF PHYSICIAN AND PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING USING A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT. Value in Health. 10(6). A346–A346. 3 indexed citations
6.
Phillips, Kathryn A., Stephanie Van Bebber, Judith M. E. Walsh, Deborah A. Marshall, & Lehana Thabane. (2006). Peer Reviewed: A Review of Studies Examining Stated Preferences for Cancer Screening. Preventing Chronic Disease. 3(3). 1 indexed citations
7.
Phillips, Kathryn A., Stephanie Van Bebber, & Amalia M. Issa. (2006). Diagnostics and biomarker development: priming the pipeline. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 5(6). 463–469. 87 indexed citations
8.
Phillips, Kathryn A., Stephanie Van Bebber, Deborah A. Marshall, Judith M. E. Walsh, & Lehana Thabane. (2006). A review of studies examining stated preferences for cancer screening.. PubMed. 3(3). A75–A75. 33 indexed citations
9.
Phillips, Kathryn E., Stephanie Van Bebber, David L. Veenstra, & Julie Sakowski. (2003). The Economics of Pharmacogenomics. 1(4). 277–284. 6 indexed citations
10.
Phillips, Kathryn A., David L. Veenstra, Stephanie Van Bebber, & Julie Sakowski. (2003). An introduction to cost-effectiveness and cost–benefit analysis of pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 4(3). 231–239. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026