Juan Pekolj
- Surgery top 0.1%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 0.2%
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Hepatology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Eduardo de SantibáñesRolf GrafRobert PadburyRichard D. SchulickMichelle OliveiraRené VonlanthenMasatoshi MakuuchiPierre A. Clavien
- Topics
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (36 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (26 papers)Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Juan Pekolj
102 papers receiving 9.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Surgery 6.8k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 4.1k
- Oncology 3.3k
- Hepatology 1.7k
- Epidemiology 994
Countries citing papers authored by Juan Pekolj
This map shows the geographic impact of Juan Pekolj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juan Pekolj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juan Pekolj more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juan Pekolj
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juan Pekolj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juan Pekolj. The network helps show where Juan Pekolj may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juan Pekolj
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juan Pekolj. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juan Pekolj based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Juan Pekolj. Juan Pekolj is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Duodenopancreatectomía totalmente laparoscópica: Consideraciones técnicas y aplicabilidad inicial en un centro de alto volumen de cirugía pancreática | 2 |
| 18 | Tratamiento lapascópico de las fístulas biliodigestivas y del síndrome de Mirizzi tipo II | 0 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Juan Pekolj
Juan Pekolj is a scholar working on Hepatology, Transplantation and Surgery, having authored 108 papers that have together received 9.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (36 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (26 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (1.7k citations), Surgery (6.8k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.1k citations). Juan Pekolj has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo de Santibáñes, Rolf Graf, Robert Padbury, Richard D. Schulick, Michelle Oliveira, René Vonlanthen, Masatoshi Makuuchi, Pierre A. Clavien, Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey and Jeffrey Barkun. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgery, British journal of surgery and Transplantation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.