Juan M. Cuerva
- Organic Chemistry top 0.2%
- Materials Chemistry top 2%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Co-authors
- Araceli G. CampañaJ. Enrique OltraJosé JusticiaLuı́s Álvarez de CienfuegosCarlos M. CruzD. MiguelDiego J. CárdenasErmelinda Maçôas
- Topics
- Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (51 papers)Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (32 papers)Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (27 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyChemical Society ReviewsAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Juan M. Cuerva
201 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Organic Chemistry 4.7k
- Materials Chemistry 2.1k
- Inorganic Chemistry 900
- Molecular Biology 816
- Spectroscopy 626
Countries citing papers authored by Juan M. Cuerva
This map shows the geographic impact of Juan M. Cuerva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juan M. Cuerva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juan M. Cuerva more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Juan M. Cuerva
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juan M. Cuerva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juan M. Cuerva. The network helps show where Juan M. Cuerva may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Juan M. Cuerva
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Juan M. Cuerva. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Juan M. Cuerva based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Juan M. Cuerva. Juan M. Cuerva is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 172 | |
| 19 | 54 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Juan M. Cuerva
Juan M. Cuerva is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 205 papers that have together received 6.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (51 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (32 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (4.7k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (900 citations) and Materials Chemistry (2.1k citations). Juan M. Cuerva has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Araceli G. Campaña, J. Enrique Oltra, José Justicia, Luı́s Álvarez de Cienfuegos, Carlos M. Cruz, D. Miguel, Diego J. Cárdenas, Ermelinda Maçôas, Antonio Rosales and Rafael Robles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Society Reviews and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.